Introduction

In large cross-sectional population studies, mean serum phosphorus (or inorganic phosphate, iP) remains fairly constant at approximately 3.8 mg/dL in subjects with normal kidney function. It does the same in those with impaired kidney function until the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) falls to below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2which represents Stage 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD). At this point serum phosphorus levels start to rise and continue rising as these patients reach end-stage kidney disease (ESRD, Stage 5).1 The relative constancy of the serum iP in normal and early kidney disease is maintained by the interaction of multiple factors including parathyroid hormone (PTH), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF 23), vitamin D, and others acting on the gut, kidneys, and bone.

Serum Phosphorus Range, Function, and Consequence

For clinical purposes, the normal range of serum iP is said to be between 3 mg/dL and 4.5 mg/dL. However, in large cross-sectional studies of normal subjects, and in subjects with mild or moderate renal function impairment, serum iP has been reported to range between 1.6 mg/dL and 6.2 mg/dL.13 The reasons for this wide range of serum iP appear to be due in part to diet, PTH, and vitamin D level but mostly due to factors yet to be identified. Of note, examination of U.S. adults between 1988 and 1994 revealed a mean serum phosphorus of 3.4 mg/dL, but more recent data (20032006) demonstrates the mean to be 3.8 mg/dL.1,4 The reason for this increase remains uncertain.

Present mainly within cells, phosphorus is critical for multiple biological and biochemical reactions vital to the maintenance of life, not the least of which is storage of energy to be used by all cells including skeletal and heart muscle. Severe deficiency of phosphorus results in multiple systemic disorders, as would be anticipated. However, a number of recent studies have demonstrated a correlation between the level of serum iP and the development of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, with higher levels of serum iPwithin the expanded normal rangepredicting a higher risk of adverse events.5,6 In patients with ESRD, in whom all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality are markedly higher than in subjects with normal renal function, and in those with mild or moderate renal function impairment, a serum iP level greater than 5.5 mg/dL is associated with a further increase in the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. These observations have prompted clinicians to focus on lowering serum iP as the primary strategy for managing dialysis patients. In accomplishing the goal, consideration should also be given to the events preceding ESRD that impede control of serum iP.

Bone Disease Prevalence and Contribution to Serum Phosphorus

As with the general population, people with CKD have baseline risks for bone disease that increase with loss of kidney function. Generally speaking, since bone is a contributor to phosphorus homeostasis, the prevalence of bone disease in U.S. adults should be taken into account when considering patients with CKD. More than 10 million U.S. adults over age 50 have osteoporosis, a preventable bone disease.7 Furthermore, it is estimated that more than 33.6 million adults over age 50 have reduced bone mass.8 Recent reports indicate that approximately 14 of U.S. adults have CKD, and 33 of U.S. adults aged 60 and older have CKD, approximately 15 million people.9 Therefore, a majority of these patients will have osteopenia or osteoporosis in addition to the mineral-bone disorder of CKD.

Bone health is dependent on dietary intake of vitamins and minerals (Table 1). Three major bone nutrients are calcium, phosphorus, and vitamin D. During growth and development, only one-fourth to one-third of dietary calcium is absorbed and almost entirely stored in bones and teeth. In contrast, approximately 70 of dietary phosphorus is absorbed, and the amount of absorption depends on the type of phosphorus: 30 to 70 of the phosphorus found naturally in foods is absorbable,10 whereas 100 of phosphorus from inorganic phosphate additives (used for preservation or enhancement of shelved foods and some baked goods) is absorbable.11 Furthermore, up to 23 of foods consumed in the United States have added inorganic phosphates.1 It is estimated that U.S. adults consume 180 of the recommended amount of dietary phosphorus without accounting for phosphate additives. Conversely, fewer than 10 of U.S. females aged 13 years and older meet the recommended amount of dietary calcium from foods, and even with dietary supplements, fewer than half of men aged 50 and older get an adequate amount of calcium.12 In addition, dietary vitamin D intake is inadequate in the majority of adults even when accounting for dietary supplement use.12 This is important for bone health as well as cardiovascular and kidney health because biomarkers of bone turnover (e.g., serum parathyroid hormone, urine excretion of N-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen) are increased and biomarkers of bone formation (e.g., bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) are decreased when dietary phosphorus intake is proportionally higher than dietary calcium intake.1315 Increased bone turnover releases calcium and phosphorus into the circulation, leading to vascular medial calcinosis and a compensatory increase in parathyroid hormone and the phosphaturic hormone FGF23 to handle the increased phosphorus load. Ultimately, bones are potentially weakened and excess calcium is deposited into soft tissues because dietary nutrient intakes are inadequate (e.g., < 1000 mg/d of calcium) or excessive (e.g., > 700 mg/d of phosphorus). As kidney disease progresses and there is less ability to balance phosphorus through urinary excretion, the increased circulating phosphorus further exacerbates bone turnover. By Stage 4 CKD, it becomes apparent that circulating phosphorus is increasing, and by Stage 5 CKD, serum iP control requires the use of phosphate binder medications in addition to chronic dialysis.

Controlling Serum Phosphorus in ESRD

Clinicians use a three-pronged approach to controlling serum iP in dialysis patients: (1) removal of ultrafilterable and diffusible phosphorus with dialysis, (2) restriction of dietary phosphate intake, and (3) use of orally administered phosphate binders to limit the absorption from the intestinal contents of ingested phosphate. Despite these efforts, serum iP levels in one-third to one-half of all patients on dialysis run higher than 5.5 mg/dL. While this is often attributed to patient nonadherence, there are a number of legitimate factors contributing to persistent hyperphosphatemia in dialysis patients, including the following:

  1. The removal of phosphate during one hemodialysis session amounts to only 800 mg to 1,000 mg. Thus dialysis 3 times a week is insufficient to remove the recommended daily intake of phosphorus for patients requiring dialysis (1,000 mg/d).
  2. It is extremely difficult to limit phosphate intake while attempting to meet the recommended daily protein intake for patients having chronic hemodialysis of 1.1 to 1.3 gm/kg body weight.
  3. Many retail food products have highly bioavailable inorganic phosphate added as a preservative to maintain freshness. As mentioned earlier, these contribute to the patient's phosphate burden.
  4. Patients on dialysis have to take multiple medications, and the phosphate binders add to the patient's pill burden.
  5. Phosphate binders are generally large pills that are hard to swallow, or if chewed during a meal may distort the sense of taste, making adherence difficult. Furthermore, these medications often cause gastrointestinal upset and are variable in their phosphate-binding capacity.
  6. Finally, two additional contributing factors have been highlighted, both related to measures used in the management of these patients. One is the administration of high doses of calcitriol, or its analogues, which are known to enhance active phosphate absorption from the small intestine. The other factor is the lowering of intestinal free phosphate concentration, whether by dietary phosphate restriction or with phosphate binders, which is a known stimulus to enhance phosphate absorption from the small bowel. These two important factors impede the patient's efforts to control their phosphate burden.

All of the above considerations, but especially the last, have led investigators to consider intestinal active phosphate transport as a novel target for therapy. In mice with experimentally induced renal failure and hyperphosphatemia, the hyperphosphatemia was corrected by conditional knockout of the small intestine phosphate transporter, NaP2b, in combination with sevelamer to reduce passive phosphate absorption (Figure 1).6 A novel inhibitor of intestinal Na/H exchange has recently been shown to be effective in controlling hyperphosphatemia in a similar setting. In terms of a clinically available and effective therapy, nicotinamide, a widely used lipid-lowering agent, has been shown to inhibit NaP2b and lower serum iP in CKD patients.

Figure 1. 

Potential cellular targets for altering phosphate absorption in the small intestine. Sodium-independent phosphate transporter 2b (Npt2b) and Pit1 are responsible for more than 50 of phosphate absorption. Pi: inorganic phosphate; FGF23: fibroblast growth factor 23. Reprinted with permission from Weinman et al.6

Summary

The development of more potent inhibitors should be forthcoming, but it is important to emphasize that there will always be a place for phosphate binders to block the passive absorption of phosphate for people with advanced CKD. Furthermore, protecting and monitoring bone health should also aid in controlling serum iP as CKD advances.

Key Points

  • The kidney, bone, and digestive system elegantly control serum inorganic phosphate (iP), but even people with normal kidney function are known to have a wide range of serum iP, placing them at increased risk for cardiovascular-related mortality.
  • Diet, aging, and chronic disease influence the control of serum iP. Low calcium/high phosphorus diets contribute to bone disease. Many people who are age 50 and older have significant osteoporosis and are more prone to cardiovascular and kidney disease.
  • Once chronic kidney disease advances to end-stage renal disease, the ability to maintain normal serum iP is drastically reduced with dialysis and phosphorus binding compounds having only limited success in many patients.
  • Novel approaches are being explored, such as inhibition of intestinal transport pathways, that may prove beneficial for improving serum iP control and hopefully reduce cardiovascular mortality.