Methodist Journal

FEATURED GUEST EDITOR

ISSUE INTRO

The Burgeoning Field of Cardio-Oncology

See More
RECOGNITIONS

Barry H. Trachtenberg Leads Issue on Cardio-Oncology

See More

REVIEW ARTICLES See More

Heart Failure in Relation to Anthracyclines and Other Chemotherapies

Heart Failure in Relation to Tumor-Targeted Therapies and Immunotherapies

The Role of Cardiovascular Imaging and Serum Biomarkers in Identifying Cardiotoxicity Related to Cancer Therapeutics

Prevention and Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity

Cardiovascular Toxicities of Radiation Therapy

Electrophysiologic Complications in Cancer Patients

Vascular Toxicity in Patients with Cancer: Is There a Recipe to Clarify Treatment?

Future Directions in Cardio-Oncology

CASE REPORTS See More

A Rare Case of Pancreatitis-Induced Thrombosis of the Aorta and Superior Mesenteric Artery

Anomalous Origin of the Right Coronary Artery from the Left Main Coronary Artery in the Setting of Critical Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis

Simultaneous Transfemoral Mitral and Tricuspid Valve in Ring Implantation: First Case Report with Edwards Sapien 3 Valve

Uneventful Follow-Up 2 Years after Endovascular Treatment of a High Flow Iatrogenic Aortocaval Fistula Causing Pulmonary Hypertension and Right Heart Failure

MUSEUM OF HMH MULTIMODALITY IMAGING CENTER See More

Do Not Pass Flow: Microvascular Obstruction on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance After Reinfarction Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVES See More

EXCERPTA

Cardio-Oncology, Then and Now: An Interview with Barry Trachtenberg

POINTS TO REMEMBER

Onconephrology: An Evolving Field

POINTS TO REMEMBER

Herbal Nephropathy

EXCERPTA

Rolling the Dice on Red Yeast Rice

EDITORIALS

Letter to the Editor in Response to “Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy in Diabetes Mellitus”

Vol 13, Issue 3 (2017)

Article Full Text

CASE REPORTS

Rapid Left Ventricular Recovery After Correction of a Secundum Atrial Septal Defect: Understanding the Hemodynamics

Jump to:
Article Citation:

Thakkar AN, Kassi M, Lin CH. Rapid Left Ventricular Recovery After Correction of a Secundum Atrial Septal Defect: Understanding the Hemodynamics. Methodist DeBakey Cardiovasc J. 2017;13(3):160-164.

doi: 10.14797/mdcj-13-3-160

Abstract

Closure of an atrial septal defect (ASD) may lead to a change in the function of both ventricles. Although right ventricular function typically improves, the left ventricle (LV) may behave in different ways. This has been a matter of much debate, with some authors reporting a decline in LV function after ASD closure and others reporting delayed improvement or no identifiable change. We report the case of a 41-year-old female with a large left-to-right ASD shunt (Qp:Qs 2.3:1 and shunt volume 3.6 L/min) who presented with biventricular systolic dysfunction that improved within 24 hours of ASD closure. We also attempt to explain the underlying hemodynamics responsible for LV failure and recovery in this patient.

Keywords
atrial septal defect , left ventricular dysfunction

Background

Atrial septal defects (ASDs) account for 13% of congenital heart diseases worldwide.1 The basic hemodynamic disturbance in patients with ASDs is a left-to-right shunt that leads to an imbalance in blood flow to the pulmonary and systemic circuits. This causes right ventricular (RV) overload and subsequent RV failure. However, there are multiple reports of patients with ASDs who exhibit concomitant left ventricular (LV) dysfunction or failure as well.2-4 These patients may have normal LV end-diastolic pressures relative to decreased end-diastolic volumes, which indicates LV dysfunction.4

The hemodynamic abnormalities underlying ASD-associated LV failure are poorly understood. Proposed hypotheses implicate either intrinsic problems with the LV or problems related to the RV. Intrinsic LV problems include decreased distensibility, underfilling of the LV, or the presence of coexisting conditions unrelated to the ASD that cause LV dysfunction. Left ventricular dysfunction related to the RV could occur due to ventricular interdependence.3-5 After ASD closure, some patients may develop worsening LV function,6 whereas other patients may show improvement in LV volumes, delayed improvement, or no significant improvement of LV ejection fraction (LVEF).7-11

We describe the case of a patient with biventricular heart failure and a concomitant large ASD who showed rapid improvement of her LVEF within 24 hours after ASD closure. To the best of our knowledge, a similar case has not been previously reported.

Case Description

A 41-year-old African-American female without significant past medical history presented to us with new-onset dyspnea on exertion and bilateral pedal edema that started 2 days prior to admission and was worsening. She had never experienced similar symptoms prior to this. At baseline, she was able to ambulate comfortably. However, during the week prior to admission, her functional status had gradually declined to NYHA class III.

She was afebrile at admission with a blood pressure of 177/117 mm Hg, pulse of 89 breaths per minute, respiratory rate of 18 per minute, and oxygen saturation of 93% on room air. Her weight at admission was 148.9 pounds, which was approximately 10 pounds over her dry weight. Her physical examination was suggestive of right-sided congestive heart failure with jugular venous distension and bilateral pitting pedal edema. On auscultation, a soft 2/6 systolic murmur was heard, most prominently over the left second intercostal space.

An initial echocardiogram showed an LVEF of 30% to 34%, severely depressed RV function, normal atrial septum, and an estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure of 65 to 70 mm Hg. Due to her depressed LVEF, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) was performed to help determine a cause of her cardiomyopathy. This revealed a large secundum ASD measuring 4 cm x 2.4 cm (Figure 1). Due to the large size of the ASD, there was no color Doppler flow seen across the ASD on the initial echocardiogram; the defect seen on the subcostal view was therefore considered to be a dropout, and the interatrial septum was at first considered normal. CMR revealed a predominantly left-to-right shunt with a small bidirectional component. The net shunt volume was 3.6 L/min and the Qp:Qs ratio was 2.3:1. The patient also had global hypokinesis with an RVEF of 28% and LVEF of 37%. The Qp:Qs ratio calculated from right heart catheterization was 3.2:1. Baseline pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) was approximately 1.9 Wood units, and systemic vascular resistance was 24 Wood units. The PVR was considered satisfactory for ASD closure. Intracardiac pressure readings before and after ASD closure are presented in Table 1.

Four-chamber view on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed a large 4-cm x 2.4-cm secundum atrial septal defect with resultant severe right ventricular enlargement
Figure 1. Four-chamber view on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed a large 4-cm x 2.4-cm secundum atrial septal defect with resultant severe right ventricular enlargement. RA: right atrium; LA: left atrium; RV: right ventricle; LV: left ventricle
Intracardiac pressures measured on right heart catheterization
Table 1. Intracardiac pressures measured on right heart catheterization.

ASD measurement using a 34-mm sizing balloon revealed it to be between 34 and 36 mm in size. A small fenestration on the aortic side of the septum was also noted. A 38-mm AMPLATZER™ Septal Occluder (St. Jude Medical/Abbott) was deployed. Given the poor LV function, there was a concern that device closure would lead to acute left-sided overload and a subsequent increase in LV filling pressures with a worsening of LV function. Therefore, we measured right- and left-sided pressures after device deployment. Since her LV pressures did not increase significantly, the device was released. Some residual shunt persisted through the fenestration on the aortic side of the atrial septum.

A postprocedure echocardiogram (Figure 2, Video 1) showed a significant improvement in systolic function, with an estimated LVEF of 50% to 54% and the RVEF returning to normal. Her LV cardiac output increased from 1.9 L/min to 4.7 L/min. There was also a significant change in the pulmonary artery systolic pressure from 70 mm Hg before the procedure to 39 mm Hg after ASD closure. There was no significant change in the LV end-diastolic diameter (preclosure 4.2 cm; postclosure 4.3 cm). Clinically, she rapidly became asymptomatic by the time of her discharge with improvement of her dyspnea.   

Four-chamber view on a postprocedure transthoracic echocardiogram showed the atrial septal defect closure device in the appropriate position
Figure 2. Four-chamber view on a postprocedure transthoracic echocardiogram showed the atrial septal defect (ASD) closure device in the appropriate position. RV: right ventricle; RA: right atrium; LV: left ventricle; LA: left atrium

Video 1. There was a significant difference in ventricular function on the preprocedural echocardiogram (left) and post-closure echocardiogram (right); the large atrial septal defect was considered a dropout on the initial echocardiogram (left) due to the lack of color Doppler flow across the septum.

Video 2. D-shaped left ventricle (LV) and flattening of the interventricular septum on CMR was consistent with right ventricular (RV) overload; significant RV overload likely led to LV failure due to ventricular interdependence.

Discussion

Left ventricular performance before and after ASD repair is a matter of much debate. Our patient presented with significant biventricular failure that rapidly recovered in an atypical fashion within 24 hours of ASD closure. This was an unusual finding that raised two interesting questions: (1) What was the etiology underlying the depressed LVEF? (2) Why did the LVEF improve shortly after ASD closure?

Several authors have studied the LV in the setting of ASDs. Some have reported that patients with ASDs have normal EFs or may have subnormal LVEF responses to exercise, indicating an underlying LV dysfunction.3,4,12 Booth et al. postulated that patients with ASDs had stiffer LVs and a consequent predilection for heart failure.5

In 1982, Carabello et al. published data on hemodynamic parameters of patients with ASDs and signs of heart failure, and they compared this with data obtained from patients with ASDs but no heart failure as well as a group of normal subjects. They noticed that patients with signs of heart failure tended to have higher LV end-diastolic pressures, but their LV cardiac indices and EFs still remained comparable to normal people.13 Our patient contradicted this finding given that her LVEF was 37% at presentation—a value markedly below normal range.

The rapid improvement of her LVEF subsequent to closure is also interesting. Studies in the past have shown that LVEF does improve after ASD closure; however, these patients initially had normal or near-normal LVEFs.11,14 On the other hand, there have also been reports about worsening LV function after ASD repair due to acute postclosure volume loading.6,15 For this reason, and the fact that our patient already had preexisting moderate-to-severe LV dysfunction, we were concerned that her LV systolic function would worsen after ASD occlusion. Contrary to our expectations, her LVEF improved. We hypothesize two reasons why this could have occurred. First, the patient received diuretics for several days prior to closure, and the improved volume status caused a lower preload that could be pumped more efficiently by the failing LV. Second, the patient had fenestrations in the anterior part of her atrial septum that we were unable to close, and they caused a persistent mild left-to-right shunt. It is possible that this mild shunt allowed for decompression of the left side, thus preventing the LV from being loaded beyond its filling capacity.

Conclusion

Left and right heart interaction is an important consideration in the closure of a large ASD. The mechanism of LV failure and subsequent recovery in this patient is still unclear. However, LV dysfunction at presentation did not preclude safe ASD closure.

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

The authors have completed and submitted the Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal Conflict of Interest Statement and none were reported.

References
  1. van der Linde D, Konings EE, Slager MA, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Nov 25;58(21):2241-7.
  2. Tikoff G, Schmidt AM, Kuida H, Hecht HH. Heart failure in atrial septal defect. Am J Med. 1965 Oct;39(4):533-51.
  3. Bonow RO, Borer JS, Rosing DR, Bacharach SL, Green MV, Kent KM. Left ventricular functional reserve in adult patients with atrial septal defect: pre- and postoperative studies. Circulation. 1981;63:1315-22.
  4. Popio KA, Gorlin R, Teichholz LE, Cohn PF, Bechtel D, Herman MV. Abnormalities of left ventricular function and geometry in adults with an atrial septal defect. Am J Cardiol. 1975;36:302-8.
  5. Booth DC, Wisenbaugh T, Smith M, DeMaria AN. Left ventricular distensibility and passive elastic stiffness in atrial septal defect. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Nov;12(5):1231-6.
  6. Masutani S, Senzaki H. Left ventricular function in adult patients with atrial septal defect: implication for development of heart failure after transcatheter closure. J Card Fail. 2011 Nov;17(11):957-63.
  7. Teo KS, Dundon BK, Molaee P, et al. Percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects leads to normalisation of atrial and ventricular volumes. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2008 Dec 1;10(55).
  8. Vijayvergiya R, Singh J, Rana SS, Shetty R, Mittal BR. Early and six-month assessment of bi-ventricular functions following surgical closure of atrial septal defect. Indian Heart J. 2014 Nov-Dec;66(6):617-21.
  9. Santoro G, Pascotto M, Sarubbi B, et al. Early electrical and geometric changes after percutaneous closure of large atrial septal defect. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:876-80.
  10. Weber M, Dill T, Deetjen A, et al. Left ventricular adaptation after atrial septal defect closure assessed by increased concentrations of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in adult patients. Heart. 2006 May;92(5):671-5.
  11. Chen Q, Sun XD, Cao H, Zhang GC, Chen LW, Hu YN. Echocardiographic evaluation of changes in cardiac hemodynamics and loading conditions after transthoracic minimally invasive device closure of atrial septal defect. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 6;10(7):e0128475.
  12. Bussadori C, Oliveira P, Arcidiacono C, et al. Right and left ventricular strain and strain rate in young adults before and after percutaneous atrial septal defect closure. Echocardiography. 2011 Aug;28(7):730-7.
  13. Carabello BA, Gash A, Mayers D, Spann JF. Normal left ventricular systolic function in adults with atrial septal defect and left heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 1982 Jun;49(8):1868-73.
  14. Wu ET, Akagi T, Taniguchi M, et al. Differences in right and left ventricular remodeling after transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect among adults. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;69:866-71.
  15. Ewert P, Berger F, Nagdyman N, Kretschmar O, Lange PE. [Acute left heart failure after interventional occlusion of an atrial septal defect]. Z Kardiol. 2001 May;90(5):362-6.

Add Comments

Please login to dialogue with author.

Comments