Methodist Journal



The Burgeoning Field of Cardio-Oncology

See More

Barry H. Trachtenberg Leads Issue on Cardio-Oncology

See More


Heart Failure in Relation to Anthracyclines and Other Chemotherapies

Heart Failure in Relation to Tumor-Targeted Therapies and Immunotherapies

The Role of Cardiovascular Imaging and Serum Biomarkers in Identifying Cardiotoxicity Related to Cancer Therapeutics

Prevention and Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity

Cardiovascular Toxicities of Radiation Therapy

Electrophysiologic Complications in Cancer Patients

Vascular Toxicity in Patients with Cancer: Is There a Recipe to Clarify Treatment?

Future Directions in Cardio-Oncology


A Rare Case of Pancreatitis-Induced Thrombosis of the Aorta and Superior Mesenteric Artery

Anomalous Origin of the Right Coronary Artery from the Left Main Coronary Artery in the Setting of Critical Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis

Simultaneous Transfemoral Mitral and Tricuspid Valve in Ring Implantation: First Case Report with Edwards Sapien 3 Valve

Uneventful Follow-Up 2 Years after Endovascular Treatment of a High Flow Iatrogenic Aortocaval Fistula Causing Pulmonary Hypertension and Right Heart Failure


Do Not Pass Flow: Microvascular Obstruction on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance After Reinfarction Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention



Cardio-Oncology, Then and Now: An Interview with Barry Trachtenberg


Onconephrology: An Evolving Field


Herbal Nephropathy


Rolling the Dice on Red Yeast Rice


Letter to the Editor in Response to “Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy in Diabetes Mellitus”

Vol 15, Issue 3 (2019)

Article Full Text


Anomalous Origin of the Right Coronary Artery from the Left Main Coronary Artery in the Setting of Critical Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis

Jump to:
Article Citation:

Singam NSV, Burkhart T, Ikram S. Anomalous Origin of the Right Coronary Artery from the Left Main Coronary Artery in the Setting of Critical Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis. Methodist DeBakey Cardiovasc J. 2019;15(3):223-5.


Anomalous origin of the right coronary artery (ARCA) is an extremely rare cardiac pathology. The coronary artery can potentially course between the aorta and the pulmonary artery, putting the patient at risk for sudden cardiac death. Even rarer is an ARCA that arises from the left main coronary artery (LMCA). To our knowledge, this is the first case where an ARCA arising entirely from the LMCA is associated with critical bicuspid aortic valve stenosis.

bicuspid aortic valve , severe aortic valve stenosis , anomalous coronary artery , aortic valve replacement


Anomalous origin of a coronary artery (ACA) is a rare entity with an incidence of 1% in those undergoing angiographic evaluation.1 The most common benign variant is the anomalous origin of the left circumflex artery from a separate ostium or sinus.2 Anomalous origin of a right coronary artery (ARCA) from the left main is an extremely rare phenomenon that has only been documented in case reports.3,4 In these variants, the most common origin was the left coronary cusp. Although typically benign, ACA can lead to ischemia, chest pain, and sudden cardiac death (SCD) when it courses between the aorta and pulmonary artery.5 Multiple different anatomical subtypes of ACA contribute to the underlying pathophysiology that leads to SCD and arrthymias.6

Even rarer than ACA is a coexisting bicuspid aortic valve (BAV); there are only a few case reports documenting this combination.7,8 Patients with BAV are at risk for premature aortic stenosis and may present with chest pain, heart failure, syncope, or SCD. There have been few documented cases of ARCA arising entirely from the left main coronary artery (LMCA).3,4,9 Here, we present a case involving a young male who was diagnosed with critical bicuspid aortic stenosis and incidentally discovered to have a nondominant ARCA arising entirely from the LMCA.


A 47-year-old African American male with no pertinent medical history presented to our emergency room with angina. Vital signs upon arrival were as follows: blood pressure 112/78 mm Hg, heart rate 111 BPM, respiratory rate 22 breaths/min, and oxygen saturation 98% on noninvasive positive pressure ventilation. Electrocardiogram (ECG) was notable for left ventricular hypertrophy with repolarization changes. First troponin I was 0.01 ng/mL, with subsequent troponin levels peaking at 0.07 ng/mL. There were no dynamic ST segment changes on serial ECGs. Additional imaging revealed pulmonary edema on chest x-ray and an elevated brain natriuretic peptide of 724 pg/mL. A 2-dimensional (2D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) revealed critical aortic stenosis with a valve area of 0.4 cm2 and a mean gradient of 66 mm Hg; however, it was unclear if the patient had a bicuspid valve. He underwent a left heart catheterization that revealed a nondominant ARCA arising entirely from the LMCA (Figure 1; online video 1). The rest of the epicardial anatomy was normal except for nonobstructive atherosclerotic coronary artery disease noted in the left circumflex. He was immediately referred to cardiac surgery for aortic valve replacement. His ARCA was examined intraoperatively, and since its anatomic course did not pose a risk for compression between the aorta and pulmonary artery, his coronary anatomy was left alone. The postoperative pathology revealed a BAV.

Figure 1, Movie 1. Left anterior oblique view of a 6F Judkins left 4.0 catheter engaged into the left coronary cusp. An anomalous right coronary artery (yellow arrow) can be seen arising from the left main coronary artery.


Bicuspid aortic stenosis with an ARCA is an extremely rare congenital cardiac pathology that has only been reported in case reports.7,8,10 This case is unique in that the ARCA arose entirely from the LMCA in the setting of critical aortic stenosis. The typical presentation of patients with ACA varies between chest pain, dizziness, and SCD. Although mostly benign, an ACA can lead to SCD when it courses between the aorta and pulmonary artery.5 Therefore, it is important to analyze the course of the coronary artery either during surgery or preoperatively with cardiac computed tomography.11 The associated defect should be carefully elucidated because any surgical operation for valve management may need to be modified to include additional surgical techniques, such as coronary reimplantation, unroofing, or coronary artery bypass grafting with ligation of the ACA.6 It is also important to identify an anomalous course of an artery to avoid inadvertent injury to the vessel during surgery.

A retrospective study from Naito et al. examining the morphology and vascular defects associated with BAV showed that there was a significantly higher incidence of coronary anomalies in bicuspid valves compared to tricuspid aortic valves, with incidence rates of 7% and 3%, respectively. This same study also showed that the more common ACA involved the ARCA.  Looking at the secondary end point, patients with ACA and BAV who had received aortic valve replacement tended to have higher postoperative cardiac comorbidity, which required repeat surgery and/or coronary angiography.12 Although the reason behind this was unclear, it may be due to coronary artery hypoplasia or to the intramural location of the anomalous artery, both of which may increase surgical risk during aortic valve replacement.13

Initial workup for BAV stenosis starts with a 2D TTE and Doppler waveforms.14 All patients require a left heart catheterization to evaluate the epicardial arteries for anomalies and atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. Although medical therapy can reduce symptoms of aortic stenosis, these patients require definitive surgery to replace the aortic valve and, in some cases, repair or bypass the affected coronary artery.14 Age, anticoagulation preference, comorbidities, and underlying coronary artery anatomy all play a role in careful perioperative planning. The decision to implant a bioprosthetic versus mechanical aortic valve depends on shared decision making between the patient and physician(s) after weighing the risks and benefits of both options.15 Patients with underlying coronary artery defects that warrant cardiac surgery will require cautious outpatient monitoring with an experienced heart team. Further studies are needed to assess the long-term outcomes of these individuals.


Our patient was urgently referred to cardiac surgery. After shared decision making with careful assessment of risks and benefits, our patient opted for a tissue valve because he did not want long-term anticoagulation. He underwent successful replacement of his native valve. The course of his ARCA was examined intraoperatively and noted to be benign, so it was left alone. He did well postoperatively and was discharged with close follow-up.

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

The authors have completed and submitted the Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal Conflict of Interest Statement and none were reported.

  1. Tuo G, Marasini M, Brunelli C, Zannini L, Balbi M. Incidence and clinical relevance of primary congenital anomalies of the coronary arteries in children and adults. Cardiol Young. 2013 Jun;23(3):381-6.
  2. Yamanaka O, Hobbs RE. Coronary artery anomalies in 126,595 patients undergoing coronary arteriography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1990 Sep;21(1):28-40.
  3. Swaminath D, Panikkath R, Strefling J, Rosales A, Narayanan R, Wischmeyer J. Anomalous right coronary artery from left main coronary artery and subsequent coursing between aorta and pulmonary trunk. Case Rep Med. 2013;2013:195026.
  4. Karimi M, Murdison K, Blackwood W, Davis W. Reimplantation of anomalous right coronary artery from left main coronary artery: a surgical option. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Apr;10(4):642-4.
  5. Basso C, Maron BJ, Corrado D, Thiene G. Clinical profile of congenital coronary artery anomalies with origin from the wrong aortic sinus leading to sudden death in young competitive athletes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 May;35(6):1493-501.
  6. Agarwal PP, Dennie C, Pena E, et al. Anomalous Coronary Arteries That Need Intervention: Review of Pre- and Postoperative Imaging Appearances. Radiographics. 2017 May-Jun;37(3):740-757.
  7. Schang SJ, Pepine CJ, Bemiller CR. Anomalous coronary artery origin and bicuspid aortic valve. Vasc Surg. 1975 Mar-Apr;9(2):67-72.
  8. Khetpal A, Khetpal N, Godil A, Ali Mallick MS, Lashari MN. Anomalous right coronary artery arising from left coronary cusp with coexisting valvular heart disease. J Pak Med Assoc. 2016 Apr;66(4):492-4.
  9. Lopushinsky SR, Mullen JC, Bentley MJ. Anomalous right coronary artery originating from the left main coronary artery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Jan;71(1):357-8.
  10. Palomo AR, Schrager BR, Chahine RA. Anomalous origin of the right coronary artery from the ascending aorta high above the left posterior sinus of Valsalva of a bicuspid aortic valve. Am Heart J. 1985 Apr;109(4):902-4.
  11. Manghat N, Morgan-Hughes G, Marshall A, Roobottom C. Multidetector row computed tomography: imaging congenital coronary artery anomalies in adults. Heart. 2005 Dec;91(12):1515-22.
  12. Naito S, Petersen J, Reichenspurner H, Girdauskas E. The impact of coronary anomalies on the outcome in aortic valve surgery: comparison of bicuspid aortic valve versus tricuspid aortic valve morphotype. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018 Apr 1;26(4):617-622.
  13. Angelini P. Coronary artery anomalies: an entity in search of an identity. Circulation 2007 Mar 13;115)10):1296-305.
  14. Bonow RO, Brown AS, Gillam LD, et al. ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/EACTS/HVS/SCA/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for the Treatment of Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Heart Valve Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Nov 14;70(20):2566-2598.
  15. Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making—pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):780-1.

Add Comments

Please login to dialogue with author.