Methodist Journal



The Scourge of Cardiogenic Shock

See More

Arvind Bhimaraj, MD, MPH, Guides Issue on Cardiogenic Shock

See More


Cardiovascular Implications of COVID-19 Infections

Pathophysiology and Advanced Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Cardiogenic Shock in Patients with Advanced Chronic Heart Failure

Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock

Management of Cardiogenic Shock in a Cardiac Intensive Care Unit

Physiological Concepts of Cardiogenic Shock Using Pressure-Volume Loop Simulations: A Case-Based Review

Systems of Care in Cardiogenic Shock


COVID-19: A Potential Risk Factor for Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Repair of Extent III Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm in the Presence of Aortoiliac Occlusion

Williams-Beuren Syndrome: The Role of Cardiac CT in Diagnosis

A Rare Case of Pancreatitis-Induced Thrombosis of the Aorta and Superior Mesenteric Artery


A T2-Weighty Discovery: Aortitis on Cardiac MRI with Histopathologic Correlation



Acute Kidney Injury in Cardiogenic Shock


Cardio-Oncology, Then and Now: An Interview with Barry Trachtenberg


Onconephrology: An Evolving Field


Herbal Nephropathy


Letter to the Editor in Response to “Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy in Diabetes Mellitus”

Vol 15, Issue 1 (2019)

Article Full Text


Poststatin Lipid Therapeutics: A Review

Jump to:
Article Citation:

Jia X, Lorenz P, Ballantyne CM. Poststatin Lipid Therapeutics: A Review. Methodist DeBakey Cardiovasc J. 2019;15(1):32-8.


Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a well-established risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Statins remain the first-line therapy for patients with elevated LDL-C and increased risk. However, many at-risk patients do not achieve adequate LDL-C lowering with statin monotherapy or do not tolerate statins because of side effects. Recent cardiovascular outcome trials involving ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy of nonstatin therapies in further reducing LDL-C levels and ASCVD risk. This review highlights the available nonstatin therapeutic options and explores important novel therapeutic approaches currently under development.

nonstatin therapy , LDL cholesterol , atherosclerosis , ezetimibe , PCSK9


Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States.1 Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a well-established risk factor and an important biomarker for risk assessment. Deaths related to ASCVD have steadily declined in the last two decades, due in large part to advances in pharmacologic interventions and guideline-directed utilization of LDL-C-lowering therapies.2

Perhaps the most important discovery in the treatment of ASCVD is the identification of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, which led to the development of statins. The primary mechanism of action of statins is the competitive inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase, a crucial enzyme catalyzing an early step in the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway. The decrease in cholesterol synthesis results in the upregulation of LDL receptors in hepatocytes and, in turn, increased clearance of circulating LDL particles by the liver. Multiple large randomized trials have validated the efficacy of statins in reducing the major clinical manifestations of atherosclerosis, including coronary events, ischemic strokes, and mortality.3

However, many at-risk patients do not achieve adequate LDL-C lowering on statin monotherapy or are unable to tolerate effective statin doses because of side effects, most commonly myalgia.4 In these clinical scenarios, practitioners must be able to select alternative agents to employ in conjunction with or in place of statin therapy. This review discusses some of the available nonstatin therapeutic options for reducing LDL-C and conferred ASCVD risk (Table 1) and highlights important novel therapeutic approaches in the developmental pipeline (Table 2).

Table 1. Currently available nonstatin therapy for lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C).* PCSK9: proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9; VLDL: very low-density lipoprotein; GI: gastrointestinal.


Table 2. Future therapies in development. ANGPTL3: angiopoietin-like 3; apo: apolipoprotein; Lp(a): lipoprotein(a); siRNA: small interfering RNA


Serum cholesterol originates from either de novo biosynthesis via the liver or from gut absorption. While statins target cholesterol biosynthesis in hepatocytes, ezetimibe acts primarily by limiting dietary cholesterol absorption in the small intestine. A small-molecule drug taken orally, ezetimibe selectively inhibits the cholesterol transport protein Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 (NPC1L1) protein on enterocytes. The resulting decrease in gastrointestinal uptake leads to a decrease in hepatic LDL-C stores, upregulation of LDL receptors, and increased clearance of LDL particles.5

In a meta-analysis of eight placebo-controlled trials, ezetimibe was found to lower LDL-C by 18.6% as monotherapy.6 When added to a statin as a second-line therapy, ezetimibe plus statin demonstrated an incremental reduction of 23.4% compared with statin plus placebo.7 Early outcome trials, including the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis (SEAS) trial and the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP), demonstrated significant reduction of both LDL-C and major cardiovascular events in patients treated with ezetimibe plus statin compared with those receiving only statin.8,9 The Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial (IMPROVE-IT) was a landmark study comparing ezetimibe plus simvastatin and simvastatin monotherapy in a high-risk population with recent acute coronary syndrome and LDL-C < 125 mg/dL. This trial further confirmed that ezetimibe, when added to statin therapy, incrementally reduced LDL-C and improved cardiovascular outcomes.10 Post hoc analysis of IMPROVE-IT showed that the benefits of ezetimibe plus statin were greatest in patients with additional high-risk features, including congestive heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, stroke, peripheral artery disease, estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, age > 75 years, smoking, and coronary artery bypass grafting.11 Based on the present evidence, the American College of Cardiology Expert Decision Consensus Pathway on nonstatin therapies recommends ezetimibe as one of the two initial nonstatin agents that can be added to maximally tolerated statin therapy in high-risk patients not at goal for LDL-C.12 Moreover, ezetimibe is favored as the initial nonstatin agent in patients who require < 25% additional lowering of LDL-C, when cost and ease of use are taken into consideration, as well as in primary prevention of ASCVD.12


LDL receptors on the hepatocyte surface bind LDL, and the complex is endocytosed before dissociation in the cytosol. A single LDL receptor can undergo up to 150 cycles of binding, uptake, and return to the cell surface before metabolism in the lysosome.13 Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) is a key mediator in the process, binding with LDL receptors, directing their metabolism, and preventing their recycling. Hence, PCSK9 inhibitors allow increased LDL-receptor recycling to the cell surface of hepatocytes, thereby increasing LDL-C clearance from circulation.14 Evolocumab and alirocumab, fully human monoclonal antibody therapies that inhibit PCSK9, were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2015 for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia in conjunction with statins (Table 1).

The Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research with PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects with Elevated Risk (FOURIER) trial randomized 27,564 stable, high-risk patients with a history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or symptomatic peripheral artery disease to receive evolocumab or placebo; all patients continued statin therapy.15 At 48 weeks, evolocumab in conjunction with statin lowered LDL-C by 59%, with an absolute LDL-C reduction of 56 mg/dL to a median of 30 mg/dL. At a median follow-up of 2.2 years, evolocumab in combination with statin further reduced primary outcomes, defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, or coronary revascularization (9.8% in treatment group vs 11.3% in control group), with a relative risk reduction of 15%. Treatment with evolocumab also decreased the composite secondary outcomes, defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (5.9% in treatment group vs 7.4% in control group), but had no effect on mortality.15

The ODYSSEY Outcomes trial evaluated the effectiveness of alirocumab in reducing coronary heart disease death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal and nonfatal ischemic stroke, and unstable angina requiring hospitalization in 18,924 patients with acute coronary syndrome 1 to 12 months before randomization. At a median follow-up of 2.8 years, absolute LDL-C reduction was 54.7% and the primary end point of major adverse cardiovascular events was significantly reduced in the alirocumab group compared with placebo (9.5% vs 11.1%, relative risk reduction of 15%). The alirocumab group also showed reduction in nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, unstable angina, and all-cause mortality but did not show a significant difference in cardiovascular-related death compared with placebo.16

Though the FOURIER and ODYSSEY trials showed that evolocumab and alirocumab were efficacious, initial economic studies based on reductions in negative outcomes have raised questions on the cost-effectiveness of using PCSK9 inhibitors to prevent ASCVD events. The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) estimated that for evolocumab to achieve a cost-effectiveness threshold of $100,000 to $150,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), the annual drug price would have to be reduced to $1,725 to $2,242, which would represent a needed discount of 85% to 88% from the wholesale acquisition cost of $14,523 annually.17 Based on data from the ODYSSEY Outcomes trial, ICER estimated that for alirocumab to achieve the same QALY threshold as above, the price would need to be discounted to $2,306 to $3,441 annually. However, given the mortality benefit demonstrated in ODYSSEY Outcomes, ICER estimated that cost-effectiveness improves with a reduced price ranging from $5,324 to $7,975 annually when treating higher-risk patients (LDL-C ? 100 mg/dL) and assuming reduction of both major coronary heart events and all-cause mortality.18


The identification of PCSK9 as a well-validated target for LDL-C reduction led to the development of other strategies to lower circulating PCSK9 levels, including the use of small interfering RNA (siRNA), monobodies known as adnectins, and peptide-based vaccines. Here, we will elaborate on gene silencing against PCSK9, which is in the last stage of clinical development. The two major strategies for disrupting gene expression at the transcription level are antisense oligonucleotides and siRNA. Antisense inhibitors, such as mipomersen targeting apolipoprotein (apo) B100, act by binding to messenger RNA (mRNA), resulting in RNase-mediated degradation.19 On the other hand, siRNA technology harnesses native cellular RNA interference pathways to bind and cleave target mRNA and, in turn, decrease synthesis of the target protein. siRNA are naturally occurring, short, double-stranded RNA molecules that bind intracellularly to the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), which unwinds the siRNA and incorporates the single-strand siRNA. The siRNA-bound RISC then targets the specified complementary mRNA molecules and induces mRNA cleavage and degradation. Importantly, a single siRNA-bound RISC is able to bind and cleave many mRNA transcripts.20

Inclisiran (ALN-PCSsc) is a subcutaneously administered long-acting siRNA molecule targeting PCSK9. In a phase 2 trial (ORION-1), inclisiran was shown to significantly reduce PCSK9 and LDL-C levels in a dose-dependent manner.21 Moreover, the effect on circulating PCSK9 and LDL-C levels persisted for at least 240 days. At 6 months, the least squares mean reduction in LDL-C in the inclisiran group versus placebo ranged from 27.9% to 41.9% after single-dose administration and from 35.5% to 52.6% after two doses. This pharmacodynamic characteristic allowing potential administration of therapy every 6 months may confer a distinct advantage over the current PCSK9 monoclonal antibody agents, which require administration either once or twice per month. The most common adverse effects were musculoskeletal pain, nasopharyngitis, headache, dizziness, fatigue, hypertension, and diarrhea; however, the incidence of adverse events was not significantly different compared with placebo. Serious adverse events occurred in 11% of patients on inclisiran and 8% of patients on placebo.21 Several phase 3 clinical trials (ORION-9, -10, -11) and a cardiovascular outcomes trial (ORION-4) are currently underway.22-25


Bempedoic acid (ETC-1002) is a novel lipid-lowering agent that targets adenosine triphosphate citrate lyase (ACL). ACL acts upstream of HMG-CoA reductase and catalyzes the production of acetyl coenzyme A (CoA), the precursor of the mevalonate pathway of cholesterol synthesis. Similar to the downstream effects of disrupting this pathway by statins, ETC-1002 decreases hepatic cholesterol production, which stimulates upregulation of LDL receptors and increases uptake of circulating LDL-C. This oral prodrug is converted in the liver by acyl-CoA synthetase to ETC-1002-CoA, which then inhibits ACL.26 Interestingly, the isoform of acyl-CoA synthetase responsible for this conversion is predominantly expressed in the liver and not expressed in skeletal muscle.27 Theoretically, this localization to the liver may result in fewer musculoskeletal side effects.

Several clinical trials have shown safety and efficacy of bempedoic acid in patients with hypercholesterolemia. After 12 weeks of randomized treatment with 40, 80, or 120 mg of ETC-1002 daily, hypercholesterolemic patients demonstrated LDL-C least squares mean reductions of 17.9%, 25%, and 26.6%, respectively, compared to a 2.1% reduction with placebo.28 The LDL-C–lowering effects were seen across subgroups of elevated and nonelevated triglycerides. Moreover, ETC-1002 also lowered LDL particle number, apoB, and non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non–HDL-C) in a dose-dependent manner.28 In patients with diabetes, treatment with ETC-1002 for 4 weeks led to a significant reduction of LDL-C by 39% and of non–HDL-C by 31.4% compared with placebo.29 In addition, patients on ETC-1002 showed a 40.5% median reduction in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) compared with 11% seen in the placebo group.29

The use of ETC-1002 has also been evaluated in combination with statins and, in patients unable to tolerate statins, in combination with ezetimibe. Added to background atorvastatin £ 20 mg, simvastatin £ 20 mg, pravastatin £ 40 mg, or rosuvastatin £ 10 mg, ETC-1002 reduced LDL-C by up to 24%.30 The first completed phase 3 trial of ETC-1002, Cholesterol Lowering via Bempedoic acid and ACL-inhibiting Regimen (CLEAR) Tranquility, showed that bempedoic acid has potential as a therapeutic option complementary to ezetimibe in statin-intolerant patients.31 When added to ezetimibe, bempedoic acid at 180 mg daily reduced LDL-C by 28.5% compared with ezetimibe alone and was well tolerated. The study further showed significant reductions of apoB, non–HDL-C, and hs-CRP compared with placebo. Several other phase 3 clinical trials on bempedoic acid are ongoing, including an outcome trial, CLEAR Outcomes, which is estimated to be completed in 2022.32


Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been shown in multiple studies to be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease.33,34 Lp(a) has a complex structure that exhibits similarities to plasminogen and LDL. It contains apo(a), a unique glycoprotein containing 3 to > 50 kringle motifs similar to those found on plasminogen. Given the similarity in structure, Lp(a) is thought to compete with plasminogen at the binding site of tissue plasminogen activator; as a result, it limits fibrinolysis and potentiates thrombogenesis.35 The structure and lipid content of Lp(a) is also similar to LDL, containing apoB and rich in cholesterol.36 Lp(a) has been shown to bind oxidized phospholipids and localize within the arterial wall, thus contributing to atherogenesis.35

Commercial laboratory measurements of LDL-C also reflect cholesterol content from Lp(a) particles. In patients with significantly elevated Lp(a), reported LDL-C may include 25% to 50% Lp(a) cholesterol [Lp(a)-C].37 However, unlike LDL-C, which can be effectively lowered with statins by upregulation of LDL receptors, Lp(a)-C has not been shown to respond significantly to statins.38 In contrast, PCSK9 inhibitors have demonstrated some efficacy in reducing Lp(a)—by up to 30% in a dose-dependent fashion. The mechanism of PCSK9 inhibition and Lp(a) reduction remains unclear, although available studies suggest involvement of the LDL receptor pathway as well as influence of apoB synthesis and availability.39 Niacin also decreases Lp(a) levels, but response is dependent on apo(a) phenotype.40 Recently, the development of a novel antisense oligonucleotide against apo(a), IONIS-APO(a)Rx, is providing a potential means of directly targeting Lp(a) in the future. Phase 2 data have shown mean Lp(a) reduction of 66.8% to 71.6% compared with placebo.41


Although we have highlighted newer agents for LDL-C lowering, lifestyle modification with diet and exercise remains one of the most important interventions in treating dyslipidemia. In addition, while bile acid-binding resins and niacin are older medications that lower LDL-C, they have not been shown to improve outcomes when added to statins and thus are third-line options.12 Mipomersen and lomitapide are two orphan drugs approved for use in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), but given their side-effect profiles, they have not been approved for broader indications. LDL apheresis may be used in severe hypercholesterolemia, usually with homozygous FH or heterozygous FH not responding to other therapy.42 Finally, several novel drugs are under investigation that aim at reducing triglycerides and triglyceride-rich apo-B–containing lipoproteins (Table 2).43,44 Detailed discussion of these therapies are beyond the scope of this review.


At this time, statins remain the first-line therapy for patients with elevated LDL-C and increased ASCVD risk. However, trials involving ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors offer two important insights: (1) lowering LDL-C to the lowest level possible, far below the currently recommended 70 mg/dL, appears to confer additional cardiovascular outcomes benefit, and (2) adding select nonstatin agents to background statin therapy can confer further outcomes benefits. With the availability and validation of new agents, nonstatin regimens in conjunction with or independent of statin therapy are promising options and should be considered if maximally tolerated statin monotherapy does not reduce LDL-C to desired levels. As we enter the evolving field of precision medicine and personalized diagnostics, noninvasive imaging techniques such as calcium scoring, protein biomarkers, and even genetic assays will allow practitioners to assess risk more accurately, determine potential drug intolerance or resistance, and better select medications for treatment. With increased availability of effective nonstatin therapies coupled with advances in risk assessment and diagnostic approaches, the stage is set for a new era in the management of dyslipidemia.


  • Statins remain first-line therapy for patients with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and increased atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk.
  • Adding select nonstatin agents to background statin therapy and lowering LDL-C to the lowest level possible can confer additional outcomes benefits.
  • Agents currently in development provide promising options for reducing LDL-C beyond maximally tolerated statin monotherapy.
  • Increased availability of effective nonstatin therapies combined with advances in risk assessment and diagnostic approaches will enable informed selection of optimal lipid-modifying strategies.
Conflict of Interest Disclosure

Dr. Ballantyne is a formal advisor for Akcea, Amarin, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, Esperion, Matinas BioPharma Inc., Merck, Novartis, Regeneron, and Sanofi-Synthelabo and conducts research on behalf of Akcea, Amarin, Amgen, Esperion, Novartis, Regeneron, and Sanofi-Synthelabo.

  1. Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, et al.; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2018 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. 2018 Mar 20;137(12):e67-e492.
  2. Weir HK, Anderson RN, Coleman King SM, et al. Heart Disease and Cancer Deaths – Trends and Projections in the United States, 1969-2020. Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Nov 17;13:E157.
  3. Baigent C, Blackwell L, Emberson J, et al.; Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 2010 Nov 13;376(9753):1670-81.
  4. Stroes ES, Thompson PD, Corsini A, et al. Statin-associated muscle symptoms: impact on statin therapy-European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel Statement on Assessment, Aetiology and Management. Eur Heart J. 2015 May 1;36(17):1012-22.
  5. Phan BA, Dayspring TD, Toth PP. Ezetimibe therapy: mechanism of action and clinical update. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2012;8:415-27.
  6. Pandor A, Ara RM, Tumur I, et al. Ezetimibe monotherapy for cholesterol lowering in 2,722 people: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Intern Med. 2009 May;265(5):568-80.
  7. Morrone D, Weintraub WS, Toth PP, et al. Lipid-altering efficacy of ezetimibe plus statin and statin monotherapy and identification of factors associated with treatment response: a pooled analysis of over 21,000 subjects from 27 clinical trials. Atherosclerosis. 2012 Aug;223(2):251-61.
  8. Rossebø AB, Pedersen TR, Boman K, et al.; SEAS Investigators. Intensive lipid lowering with simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 25;359(13):1343-56.
  9. Baigent C, Landray MJ, Reith C, et al.; SHARP Investigators. The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with chronic kidney disease (Study of Heart and Renal Protection): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2011 Jun 25;377(9784):2181-92.
  10. Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, et al.; IMPROVE-IT Investigators. Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 18;372(25):2387-97.
  11. Bohula EA, Morrow DA, Giugliano RP, et al. Atherothrombotic Risk Stratification and Ezetimibe for Secondary Prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Feb 28;69(8):911-21.
  12. Lloyd-Jones DM, Morris PB, Ballantyne CM, et al. 2017 Focused Update of the 2016 ACCExpert Consensus Decision Pathway on the Role of Non-Statin Therapies for LDL-Cholesterol Lowering in the Management of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Expert Consensus Decision Pathways. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Oct 3;70(14):1785-822.
  13. Goldstein JL, Brown MS, Anderson RG, Russell DW, Schneider WJ. Receptor-mediated endocytosis: concepts emerging from the LDL receptor system. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1985;1:1-39.
  14. Tavori H, Fan D, Blakemore JL, et al. Serum proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 and cell surface low-density lipoprotein receptor: evidence for a reciprocal regulation. Circulation. 2013 Jun 18;127(24):2403-13.
  15. Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, et al.; FOURIER Steering Committee and Investigators. Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 4;376(18):1713-22.
  16. gov [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: National Library of Medicine; c2018. The ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial: topline results—alirocumab in patients after acute coronary syndrome; 2018 Mar 10 [cited 2018 Sep 17]. Available from:
  17. ICER [Internet]. Boston, MA: Institute for Clinical and Economic Review; c2018. Evolocumab for treatment of high cholesterol: effectiveness and value—new evidence update; 2017 Sep 11 [accessed 2018 Sep 17]. Available from:
  18. ICER [Internet]. Boston, MA: Institute for Clinical and Economic Review; c2018. Alirocumab for treatment of high cholesterol: effectiveness and value—preliminary new evidence update; 2018 Mar 10 [Accessed 2018 Sep 17]. Available from:
  19. Akdim F, Stroes ES, Sijbrands EJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of mipomersen, an antisense inhibitor of apolipoprotein B, in hypercholesterolemic subjects receiving stable statin therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Apr 13;55(15):1611-8.
  20. Carthew RW, Sontheimer EJ. Origins and mechanisms of miRNAs and siRNAs. Cell. 2009 Feb 20;136(4):642-55.
  21. Ray KK, Landmesser U, Leiter LA, et al. Inclisiran in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk with Elevated LDL Cholesterol. N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 13;376(15):1430-40.
  22. Clinical Trials [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: U.S. National Library of Medicine; c2018. Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Inclisiran Treatment on Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) in Subjects With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) (ORION-9); 2018 Apr 9 [cited 2018 Oct 12]. Available from:
  23. Clinical Trials [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: U.S. National Library of Medicine; c2018. Inclisiran for Participants With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Elevated Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (ORION-10); 2018 Apr 23 [cited 2018 Oct 12]. Available from:
  24. Clinical Trials [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: U.S. National Library of Medicine; c2018. Inclisiran for Subjects With ACSVD or ACSVD-Risk Equivalents and Elevated Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (ORION-11); 2018 Apr 26 [cited 2018 Oct 12]. Available from:
  25. TIMI Study Group [Internet]. Boston, MA: TIMI Study Group; c2018. HPS-4/TIMI 65 ORION-4l; 2018 [Accessed 2018 Sep 17]. Available from:
  26. Bilen O, Ballantyne CM. Bempedoic Acid (ETC-1002): an Investigational Inhibitor of ATP Citrate Lyase. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2016 Oct;18(10):61.
  27. Penson P, McGowan M, Banach M. Evaluating bempedoic acid for the treatment of hyperlipidaemia. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2017 Feb;26(2):251-9.
  28. Ballantyne CM, Davidson MH, Macdougall DE, et al. Efficacy and safety of a novel dual modulator of adenosine triphosphate-citrate lyase and adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase in patients with hypercholesterolemia: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Sep 24;62(13):1154-62.
  29. Gutierrez MJ, Rosenberg NL, Macdougall DE, et al. Efficacy and safety of ETC-1002, a novel investigational low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol-lowering therapy for the treatment of patients with hypercholesterolemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014 Mar;34(3):676-83.
  30. Ballantyne CM, McKenney JM, MacDougall DE, et al. Effect of ETC-1002 on Serum Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Hypercholesterolemic Patients Receiving Statin Therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2016;117:1928-33.
  31. Ballantyne CM, Banach M, Mancini GBJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid added to ezetimibe in statin-intolerant patients with hypercholesterolemia: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Atherosclerosis. 2018 Jun 12.
  32. Clinical Trials [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: U.S. National Library of Medicine; c2018. Evaluation of Major Cardiovascular Events in Patients With, or at High Risk for, Cardiovascular Disease Who Are Statin Intolerant Treated With Bempedoic Acid (ETC-1002) or Placebo (CLEAR Outcomes); 2016 Dec 15 [cited 2018 Oct 12]. Available from:
  33. Erqou S, Kaptoge S, Perry PL, et al.; Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration. Lipoprotein(a) concentration and the risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and nonvascular mortality. JAMA. 2009 Jul 22;302(4):412-23.
  34. Willeit P, Kiechl S, Kronenberg F, et al. Discrimination and net reclassification of cardiovascular risk with lipoprotein(a): prospective 15-year outcomes in the Bruneck Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Sep 2;64(9):851-60.
  35. Banach M. Lipoprotein (a)-We Know So Much Yet Still Have Much to Learn. J Am Heart 2016 Apr 23;5(4):e003597.
  36. Koschinsky ML, Boffa MB, Marcovina SM. Lipoprotein(a). In: Ballantyne CM, editor. Clinical Lipidology: A Companion to Braunwald’s Heart Disease. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2015. p. 109-27.
  37. Viney NJ, Yeang C, Yang X, Xia S, Witztum JL, Tsimikas S. Relationship between “LDL-C”, estimated true LDL-C, apolipoprotein B-100, and PCSK9 levels following lipoprotein(a) lowering with an antisense oligonucleotide. J Clin Lipidol. 2018 May – Jun;12(3):702-10.
  38. Khera AV, Everett BM, Caulfield MP, et al. Lipoprotein(a) concentrations, rosuvastatin therapy, and residual vascular risk: an analysis from the JUPITER Trial (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin). Circulation. 2014 Feb 11;129(6):635-42.
  39. Kotani K, Banach M. Lipoprotein(a) and inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9. J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jan;9(1):E78-E82.
  40. Ooi EM, Watts GF, Chan DC, et al. Effects of extended-release niacin on the postprandial metabolism of Lp(a) and ApoB-100-containing lipoproteins in statin-treated men with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015 Dec;35(12):2686-93.
  41. Viney NJ, van Capelleveen JC, Geary RS, et al. Antisense oligonucleotides targeting apolipoprotein(a) in people with raised lipoprotein(a): two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trials. Lancet. 2016 Nov 5;388(10057):2239-53.
  42. Stefanutti C, Thompson GR. Lipoprotein apheresis in the management of familial hypercholesterolaemia: historical perspective and recent advances. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2015 Jan;17(1):465.
  43. Gaudet D, Alexander VJ, Baker BF, et al. Antisense Inhibition of Apolipoprotein C-III in Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 30;373(5):438-47.
  44. Dewey FE, Gusarova V, Dunbar RL, et al. Genetic and Pharmacologic Inactivation of ANGPTL3 and Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 20;377(3):211-21.

Add Comments

Please login to dialogue with author.