Orringer C. How Much Do Lipid Guidelines Help the Clinician? Reading Between the (Guide)lines. Methodist DeBakey Cardiovasc J. 2019;15(1):16-22.
Although lipid guidelines provide updated, practical, and clinically relevant information that may be used in patient care, the continuing publication of new evidence and the inevitable treatment gaps present in all guidelines reinforce the importance of clinical judgment in shared decision making. This article explores the development of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Cholesterol Guidelines and the evidence base for managing patients with severe hypercholesterolemia, provides more recent high-quality evidence, and identifies existing treatment gaps that should be considered when caring for such patients. Although it was submitted prior to publication of the 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol, this review also includes key takeaway messages from the updated guideline.Keywords
lipid guidelines , hypercholesterolemia , familial hypercholesterolemia , statins , ezetimibe , PCSK9 inhibitors
Guideline documents synthesize the best available evidence to aid the clinician in shared decision making. Although all guidelines must be updated in accordance with newly published high-quality studies, treatment gaps must be addressed using clinical judgment. This article highlights the evidence behind the current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Cholesterol Guideline and recapitulates the principles of sound clinical judgement when managing patients with severe hypercholesterolemia.
A 35-year-old asymptomatic Caucasian male is referred for persistently elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) despite high-intensity statin therapy. His baseline lipid panel 3 months earlier showed total cholesterol 340 mg/dL, HDL-C 50 mg/dL, triglycerides 100 mg/dL, and LDL-C 270 mg/dL. At that time his glucose, urea nitrogen, creatinine, liver function studies, thyroid stimulating hormone level, and urinalysis were normal. He was prescribed atorvastatin 40 mg daily and referred to a registered dietitian-nutritionist. The patient is a nonsmoker, has no history of diabetes, does not drink alcohol, and has had mild elevated blood pressure. His family history is unknown because he was adopted. Atorvastatin is the patient’s only current medication. On examination, his waist circumference is 86 cm (34 inches), his body mass index is 27 kg/m2, and his blood pressure is 138/84 mm Hg. He has no corneal arcus or tendon xanthomas. There is a grade 2/6 early systolic murmur at the upper right sternal border, but the remainder of his examination is normal. Blood testing done 1 week prior to his visit showed total cholesterol 270 mg/dL, HDL-C 52 mg/dL, triglycerides 90 mg/dL, and LDL-C 200 mg/dL. We determine that the patient’s likelihood of engaging in more intensive lifestyle modification is low.
This patient has achieved only a 24% reduction in LDL-C in response to a high-intensity statin. Should additional blood or biomarker testing be done? Is there an evidence-based LDL-C goal? Should his statin intensity be increased or a different statin prescribed? Should ezetimibe or a bile acid sequestrant be prescribed? Is he a candidate for a PCSK9 inhibitor? This case exemplifies the importance of incorporating new information published since the 2013 guideline into patient management decisions and exposes treatment gaps that still exist in the care of such patients.
WHAT WERE THE GROUND RULES FOR THE 2013 ACC/AHA BLOOD CHOLESTEROL GUIDELINE?
In 2011, the Institute of Medicine provided eight standards for developing trustworthy clinical practice guidelines based on strong scientific evidence.1 These rigorous standards were employed in the creation of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults.2 The writing panel that developed this guideline included individuals with expertise in clinical lipidology and preventive cardiovascular medicine, and it excluded those with a clear financial conflict or whose professional or intellectual bias would reduce the credibility of the review in the eyes of the intended users. The panel’s recommendations were based primarily on data from well-designed, well-executed, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews and meta-analyses of RCTs. The purpose of the guideline was to provide clinicians with an evidence-based approach to treating cholesterol for the primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD)—including coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, and peripheral arterial disease.
The 2013 ACC/AHA Blood Cholesterol Guideline authors were careful to point out that the document was not intended to provide a comprehensive approach to the detection, evaluation, and treatment of lipid disorders. They did not make recommendations for the treatment of a wide variety of patients for whom the data were not deemed adequate to render evidence-based recommendations. In the absence of data supporting the net ASCVD risk reduction benefit of nonstatins at the time the guidelines were written, nonstatin lipid-lowering therapy was reserved for use only in high-risk patients who have a less-than-anticipated response to statins, are unable to tolerate the recommended intensity of a statin, or are completely statin intolerant. “High risk” in this context includes those with clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, those with LDL-C ? 190 mg/dL, or those with diabetes between ages 40 and 75 years. In addition, the authors suggested that clinicians who must prescribe a nonstatin should chose from those that have been shown in RCTs to provide ASCVD risk-reduction benefits that outweigh the potential for adverse effects and drug-drug interactions. While there are many areas of controversy related to the 2013 guideline, this document serves as an evidence-based foundation for adding newer data that impact net ASCVD risk reduction.
WHAT DOES THE 2013 ACC/AHA BLOOD CHOLESTEROL GUIDELINE RECOMMEND FOR THIS PATIENT?
The severe hypercholesterolemia phenotype is defined as a patient who has a calculated fasting LDL-C ? 190 mg/dL. The diagnosis is established following a confirmatory second fasting calculated LDL-C value. The 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline advises that the first step in the management of such a patient is to exclude secondary causes of hypercholesterolemia. Based on the absence of an atherogenic diet, hypothyroidism, obstructive liver disease, or renal disease, this patient’s lipid disorder appears to be primary. Ten-year ASCVD risk estimation is not required because of the presence of high baseline ASCVD risk in such patients. Although the guideline points out that there have been no randomized controlled ASCVD outcomes trials of statin therapy exclusively for patients with severe hypercholesterolemia, many trials included subjects with LDL-C ? 190 mg/dL and showed evidence of benefit from statin therapy.
The initial objective is to achieve at least a 50% reduction in LDL-C. In this case, the patient has already been treated with a high-intensity statin—atorvastatin 40 mg daily—and has shown only a 26% reduction in LDL-C. The next step is to prescribe the maximally tolerated high-intensity statin, either atorvastatin (80 mg daily) or rosuvastatin (40 mg daily) (Table 1). In either case, his LDL-C will remain markedly elevated. The guidelines then recommend considering the addition of a nonstatin. No specific LDL-C goal is set. Since the time that the 2013 guideline was published, newer RCTs with observational, genetic, and mechanistic data pertinent to the care of this patient have become available, therefore expanding potential additional evidence-based therapeutic options. See the sidebar on the next page for key updates from the most recent guideline published in late 2018.
WHAT NEW DATA EXIST REGARDING ASCVD RISK IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA?
The severe hypercholesterolemia phenotype has been estimated to affect about 7% of U.S. adults.3 It may be classified into polygenic, familial, or secondary hypercholesterolemia. The most common category is polygenic hypercholesterolemia, contributed to by lifestyle factors, often in the presence of polymorphisms of genes with smaller individual effects on LDL-C levels, although it may also be due to less-severe LDL receptor mutations and a nonpenetrant phenotype.4,5
Familial heterozygous hypercholesterolemia (FH)—a monogenic, autosomal codominant disorder present in approximately 1 in 200 to 250 U.S., European, and Scandinavian adults—is most often due to mutations in 1 of 3 genes that affect the expression of LDL receptors.3,6-8 Mutations in low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) are present in more than 90% of diagnosed cases, with more than 1,700 unique mutations described9; apolipoprotein B (apoB) mutations are present in about 5% of cases, with at least 11 mutations; and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) mutations represent about 2% of cases, with at least 16 mutations. Although rare, there are also mutations in signal transducing adaptor protein (STAP) and apoE.5,10 Far less common than the polygenic disorder, FH is estimated to represent only 1.7% of those with LDL-C ? 190 mg/dL.3 While there is no universally accepted clinical definition of FH, the diagnosis is generally made in those who have marked hypercholesterolemia with no secondary causes, clinical manifestations of excessive circulating cholesterol (tendon xanthomas or premature corneal arcus), and a family history of hypercholesterolemia and/or premature ASCVD.
The mandate to aggressively lower LDL-C in these patients and consider adding nonstatin therapy is based on their high ASCVD risk.11 A 2016 study evaluated long-term CHD death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and total ASCVD risk in U.S. adults with the severe hypercholesterolemia phenotype using data from six large epidemiological cohorts that compared ASCVD outcomes in those with LDL-C ? 190 mg/dL versus ? 130 mg/dL. After covariate adjustment, those with LDL-C ? 190 mg/dL had a very high 30-year CHD and total ASCVD risk, with a hazard ratio of up to 5.0 for CHD (95% CI, 1.1-21.7) and 4.1 for ASCVD (95% CI, 1.2-13.4). Upon examining index ages, CHD risk was accelerated by 10 to 20 years in men and 20 to 30 years in women with LDL-C ? 190 mg/dL.12
In selected patients, genetic testing that identifies the presence of mutations known to be causative for FH may provide additional valuable risk stratification. A study by Khera et al. evaluated gene sequencing data of 26,025 participants from 12 total case control and prospective cohort studies and included loss of function variants in LDLR, missense mutations in LDLR predicted to be pathogenic, and variants linked to FH in ClinVar, a clinical genetics database. Compared to those with LDL-C < 130 mg/dL, participants with LDL-C ? 190 mg/dL and no mutation had a 6-fold increased risk for CAD (OR 6.0, 95% CI, 5.2-6.9), while those with an FH mutation had a 22-fold increased risk (OR 22.3, 95% CI, 10.7-53.2). Analysis of participants who had serial lipid measurements over many years showed that cumulative exposure to LDL-C was higher for FH mutation carriers than for noncarriers.3 This increased risk is likely mediated by lifelong higher LDL-C levels rather than by the specific type of LDL receptor mutation.13
WHAT NEW INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE REGARDING TREATMENT?
Retrospective cohort studies suggest that statin therapy reduces the risk for incident myocardial infarction14 in patients with phenotypic FH and for coronary heart disease and all-cause mortality15 in patients with genetically determined FH. A placebo-controlled largely primary prevention study performed in 6,595 male subjects with a mean baseline LDL-C of 192 ± 17 mg/dL demonstrated a reduced incidence of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death in those receiving pravastatin 40 mg daily versus placebo.16 A post-hoc analysis of 2,560 exclusively primary prevention subjects from this RCT and a 20-year observational long-term follow-up study confirmed the benefit of statin therapy in these patients.17
Although there are no ASCVD outcomes data on the use of the cholesterol absorption inhibitor, ezetimibe, in patients with heterozygous FH, its use in a placebo-controlled randomized ASCVD outcomes trial of patients with recent acute coronary syndrome demonstrated greater ASCVD risk reduction with ezetimibe plus statin than with statin monotherapy. The side-effect profile of this agent was similar to placebo.18 In a small placebo-controlled RCT of patients with heterozygous FH treated with the maximally tolerated statins and ezetimibe, those who received colesevelam, the bile acid sequestrant, demonstrated a 19% mean reduction in LDL-C.19 However, the large pill burden and absence of a generic formulation of this drug limits its clinical utility.
Therapies that inhibit PCSK9 effectively lower circulating LDL-C by prolonging the half-life of the LDL receptor. Two RCTs evaluating the efficacy and safety of PCSK9 inhibitors alirocumab20 and evolocumab21 showed favorable safety profiles and an additional ? 50% reduction in LDL-C in patients with heterozygous FH taking stable, maximally tolerated statin therapy, but there are no ASCVD outcomes studies using PCSK9 inhibitors in patients with heterozygous FH. In addition, two large RCT’s of PCSK9 inhibitors administered to very-high-risk patients receiving statins with or without ezetimibe demonstrated marked LDL-C lowering, a side-effect profile similar to placebo (with the exception of a slightly greater likelihood of injection-site reactions), and significant ASCVD risk reduction.22,23 The number of patients in these studies with baseline LDL-C ? 190 mg/dL has not been reported.
Both statin and nonstain therapies that lower LDL-C via increased expression of LDL receptors have been shown to reduce ASCVD risk.24 Even so, expert panels from the National Lipid Association25 and the American College of Cardiology26 recommended that physicians consider using PCSK9 inhibitors in selected maximally treated heterozygous FH patients with persistently elevated LDL-C. This treatment option may be considered after a clinician-patient discussion about the net benefits versus cost of such therapy.
HOW DO WE INTEGRATE THE BEST AVAILABLE EVIDENCE TO DEVELOP A TREATMENT PLAN FOR THIS PATIENT?
Although he has no information about his family history, the patient likely has heterozygous FH based on his very high baseline LDL-C level and should be treated with maximally tolerated statin therapy. Despite this, this patient’s LDL-C will almost certainly remain greater than 100 mg/dL, the level above which an increased risk of ASCVD events was noted in a registry of 2,404 patients with molecularly defined FH.13 As a next step, ezetimibe is a safe, well-tolerated, generic additive therapy. While most patients experience < 20% additional LDL-C lowering, some may achieve substantially greater LDL-C lowering.27
If the decision is made to add a PCSK9 inhibitor, such therapy will almost certainly result in a ? 50% LDL-C reduction from baseline, the stated minimal goal for patients with baseline LDL-C ? 190 mg/dL according to the 2013 ACC/AHA Blood Cholesterol Guideline.2 The patient’s LDL-C would also likely fall to < 100 mg/dL, the threshold level suggested for greater net ASCVD risk reduction benefit in the 2017 Update of the 2016 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on the Role of Non-Statin Therapies for LDL-C Lowering.26 Clinicians should keep in mind that many patients fail to take their medications every day or stop taking them altogether. Therefore, a patient with a lower-than-expected reduction in LDL-C should be asked, in a nonjudgmental manner, about medication adherence.
In terms of additional diagnostic testing, measurement of lipoprotein(a), or Lp(a), may be considered since an Lp(a) concentration ? 50 mg/dL using an isoform insensitive assay is one cause of a markedly elevated LDL-C and suboptimal LDL-C lowering in response to high-intensity statin therapy.28 In a large registry of heterozygous FH patients, the finding of an Lp(a) concentration ? 50 mg/dL was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.52 (95% CI, 1.05-2.21, P = .028) for the development of incident ASCVD.13 In addition, an early systolic murmur at the upper right sternal border may indicate the presence of aortic valve disease, a condition that is accelerated in patients with an elevated concentration of Lp(a).28
Although Lp(a) lowering may be accomplished with the use of niacin and PCSK9 inhibitors, there is no current evidence that drug-induced Lp(a) reduction alters ASCVD outcomes.28 However, a prospective observational multicenter study of 170 patients who had elevated Lp(a) and progressive ASCVD despite maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy showed that lipoprotein apheresis effectively lowered the incidence of cardiovascular events.29
In this case, the patient has stage 1 hypertension in accordance with the 2017 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults. If, despite maximal lifestyle therapy, his elevated blood pressure is confirmed on subsequent office readings and home blood pressure monitoring, pharmacotherapy directed at reducing his blood pressure to < 130/80 is warranted for additional ASCVD risk reduction.30
Employing a treatment strategy based on the 2013 ACC/AHA Blood Cholesterol Guideline, and supplemented by more contemporary high-quality studies, arms the clinician with the evidence needed to provide optimal care for patients with severe hypercholesterolemia. The updated 2018 guideline31 (Table 2) that incorporates these newer data and defines remaining treatment gaps will further facilitate the delivery of high-quality preventive cardiovascular care.
- The 2013 ACC/AHA Blood Cholesterol Guideline provides a high-quality evidence base for the initial therapeutic approach to patients with severe hypercholesterolemia.
- The availability of new data from randomized controlled trials expands the evidence base and supports the selective use of nonstatin therapy for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk reduction.
- Due to the very high cost of PCSK9 inhibitors and to limited evidence on their long-term safety, the use of these agents should be reserved for selected very high-risk patients with persistent elevation in LDL-C despite maximally tolerated statin and ezetimibe therapy.
- Despite the continuing evolution of evidence-based lipid management guidelines, the inevitability of treatment gaps will continue to mandate clinician assessment of the best available evidence and a careful consideration of individual patient characteristics and preferences for therapy.
The author has completed and submitted the Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal Conflict of Interest Statement and none were reported.References
Graham R, Mancher M, Miller Wolman D, Greenfield S, Steinberg E, editors; Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical Practice guidelines we can trust. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press (US); 2011. 290 p.
2. Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014 Jun 24;129(25 Suppl 2):S1-45.
3. Khera AV, Won HH, Peloso GM, et al. Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Utility of Sequencing Familial Hypercholesterolemia Genes in Patients With Severe Hypercholesterolemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jun 7;67(22):2578-89.
4. Teslovich TM, Musunuru K, Smith AV, et al. Biological, clinical and population relevance of 95 loci for blood lipids. Nature. 2010 Aug 5;466(7307):707-13.
5. Talmud PJ, Shah S, Whittall R, et al. Use of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol gene score to distinguish patients with polygenic and monogenic familial hypercholesterolaemia: a case-control study. Lancet. 2013 Apr 13;381(9874):1293-301.
6. de Ferranti SD, Rodday AM, Mendelson MM, Wong JB, Leslie LK, Sheldrick RC. Prevalence of Familial Hypercholesterolemia in the 1999 to 2012 United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES). Circulation. 2016 Mar 15;133(11):1067-72.
7. Do R, Stitziel NO, Won HH, et al. Exome sequencing identifies rare LDLR and APOA5 alleles conferring risk for myocardial infarction. Nature. 2015 Feb 5;518(7537):102-6.
8. Benn M, Watts GF, Tybjærg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG. Mutations causative of familial hypercholesterolaemia: screening of 98 098 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study estimated a prevalence of 1 in 217. Eur Heart J. 2016 May 1;37(17):1384-94.
9. Leiden Open (source) Variation Database [Internet]. Netherlands: Leiden University Medical Center; c2004-2018. Graphs & statistics on gene LDLR; 2018 [cited 2018 Sep 28]. Available from: http://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/LDLR] 10. Wintjens R, Bozon D, Belabbas K, et al. Global molecular analysis and APOE mutations in a cohort of autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia patients in France. J Lipid Res. 2016 Mar;57(3):482-91.
11. Robinson JG, Huijgen R, Ray K, Persons J, Kastelein JJ, Pencina MJ. Determining When to Add Nonstatin Therapy: A Quantitative Approach. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Dec 6;68(22):2412-21.
12. Perak AM, Ning H, de Ferranti SD, Gooding HC, Wilkins JT, Lloyd-Jones DM. Long-Term Risk of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in US Adults With the Familial Hypercholesterolemia Phenotype. Circulation. 2016 Jul 5;134(1):9-19.
13. Pérez de Isla L, Alonso R, Mata N, et al. Predicting Cardiovascular Events in Familial Hypercholesterolemia: The SAFEHEART Registry (Spanish Familial Hypercholesterolemia Cohort Study). Circulation. 2017 May 30;135(22):2133-44.
14. Versmissen J, Oosterveer DM, Yazdanpanah M, et al. Efficacy of statins in familial hypercholesterolaemia: a long term cohort study. BMJ. 2008 Nov 11;337:a2423.
15. Besseling J, Hovingh GK, Huijgen R, Kastelein JJ, Hutten BA. Statins in Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Consequences for Coronary Artery Disease and All-Cause Mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jul 19;68(3):252-60.
16. Shepherd J, Cobbe SM, Ford I, et al. Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1995 Nov 16;333(20):1301-7.
17. Vallejo-Vaz AJ, Robertson M, Catapano AL, et al. Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Lowering for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Among Men With Primary Elevations of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels of 190 mg/dL or Above: Analyses From the WOSCOPS (West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study) 5-Year Randomized Trial and 20-Year Observational Follow-Up. Circulation. Circulation. 2017 Nov 14;136(20):1878-91.
18. Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, et al. IMPROVE-IT Investigators. Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 18;372(25):2387-97.
19. Huijgen R, Abbink EJ, Bruckert E, et al. Colesevelam added to combination therapy with a statin and ezetimibe in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Clin Ther. 2010 Apr;32(4):615-25.
20. Kastelein JJ, Ginsberg HN, Langslet G, et al. ODYSSEY FH I and FH II: 78 week results with alirocumab treatment in 735 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. Eur Heart J. 2015 Nov 14;36(43):2996-3003.
21. Raal FJ, Honarpour N, Blom DJ, et al.; TESLA Investigators. Inhibition of PCSK9 with evolocumab in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (TESLA Part B): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Jan 24;385(9965):341-50.
22. Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, et al.; FOURIER Steering Committee and Investigators. Evolocumab and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 4;376(18):1713-22.
23. Steg PG. The ODYSSEY OUTCOMES Trial: Alirocumab in patients after acute coronary syndrome. Presented at: American College of Cardiology 67th Annual Scientific Session & Expo; 2018 Mar 10; Orlando, Florida.
24. Silverman MG, Ference BA, Im K, et al. Association Between Lowering LDL-C and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Among Different Therapeutic Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016 Sep 27;316(12):1289-97.
25. Orringer CE, Jacobson TA, Saseen JJ, et al. Update on the use of PCSK9 inhibitors in adults: Recommendations from an Expert Panel of the National Lipid Association. J Clin Lipidol. 2017 Jul – Aug;11(4):880-90.
26. Lloyd-Jones DM, Morris PB, Ballantyne CM, et al. 2017 Focused Update of the 2016 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on the Role of Non-Statin Therapies for LDL-Cholesterol Lowering in the Management of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Expert Consensus Decision Pathways. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Oct 3;70(14):1785-1822.
27. Simon JS, Karnoub MC, Devlin DJ, et al. Sequence variation in NPC1L1 and association with improved LDL-cholesterol lowering in response to ezetimibe treatment. Genomics. 2005 Dec;86(6):648-56.
28. Tsimikas S. A Test in Context: Lipoprotein(a): Diagnosis, Prognosis, Controversies, and Emerging Therapies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Feb 14;69(6):692-711.
29. Leebmann J, Roeseler E, Julius U, et al.; Pro(a)LiFe Study Group. Lipoprotein apheresis in patients with maximumly tolerated lipid-lowering therapy, lipoprotein(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia, and progressive cardiovascular disease: prospective observational multicenter study. Circulation. 2013 Dec 17;128(24):2567-76.
30. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2018 Jun;71(6):1269-1324.
31. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/ APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Nov 3. pii: S0735-1097(18)39033-8. [Epub ahead of print]