Methodist Journal



The Scourge of Cardiogenic Shock

See More

Arvind Bhimaraj, MD, MPH, Guides Issue on Cardiogenic Shock

See More


Pathophysiology and Advanced Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Cardiogenic Shock in Patients with Advanced Chronic Heart Failure

Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock

Management of Cardiogenic Shock in a Cardiac Intensive Care Unit

Physiological Concepts of Cardiogenic Shock Using Pressure-Volume Loop Simulations: A Case-Based Review

Systems of Care in Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic Shock in Perioperative and Intraoperative Settings: A Team Approach


COVID-19: A Potential Risk Factor for Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Repair of Extent III Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm in the Presence of Aortoiliac Occlusion

Williams-Beuren Syndrome: The Role of Cardiac CT in Diagnosis

A Rare Case of Pancreatitis-Induced Thrombosis of the Aorta and Superior Mesenteric Artery


A T2-Weighty Discovery: Aortitis on Cardiac MRI with Histopathologic Correlation



Acute Kidney Injury in Cardiogenic Shock


Cardio-Oncology, Then and Now: An Interview with Barry Trachtenberg


Onconephrology: An Evolving Field


Herbal Nephropathy


Letter to the Editor in Response to “Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy in Diabetes Mellitus”

Vol 14, Issue 3 (2018)

Article Full Text


Venous Thrombosis and Post-Thrombotic Syndrome: From Novel Biomarkers to Biology

Jump to:
Article Citation:

Metz AK, Diaz JA, Obi AT, Wakefield TW, Myers DD, Henke PK. Venous Thrombosis and Post-Thrombotic Syndrome: From Novel Biomarkers to Biology. Methodist DeBakey Cardiovasc J. 2018;14(3):173-181.


Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common disease that carries serious ramifications for patients, including pulmonary embolism and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). While standard treatment for DVT is anticoagulation, this carries an added risk of bleeding as well as increased medication monitoring. Identifying those at risk for DVT and PTS can be difficult, and current research with murine models is helping to illuminate the biologic changes associated with these two disorders. Potential novel biomarkers for improving the diagnosis of DVT and PTS include ICAM-1, P-selectin, and cell-free DNA. Inhibition of factor XI, P- and E-selectin, and neutrophil extracellular traps hold promise for novel clinical treatment of DVT. Experimental research on PTS suggests potential cellular and mediator therapy targets of TLR9, MMP-2 and-9, PAI-1, and IL-6. While many important concepts and mechanisms have been elucidated through research on DVT and PTS, more work must be done to translate experimental findings to the clinical arena. The purpose of this review is to examine the currently used murine models of DVT, biomarkers involved in the pathophysiology and diagnosis of DVT and PTS, and potential pharmacologic targets for PTS treatment.

venous thrombosis; deep vein thrombosis; non-anticoagulant treatment; vascular biology; murine models; biomarkers; post-thrombotic syndrome


Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common disease that most often affects the lower extremities and can result in pulmonary embolism (PE).1 Together, DVT and PE constitute venous thromboembolism (VTE). Between 375,000 and 425,000 people develop VTE each year, resulting in significant morbidity, death, and an annual cost of up to $8 billion.1 The risk of developing DVT increases with age, active cancer, hospitalization, major surgery, and critical illness.2-5 Accurate, expeditious diagnosis of VTE is critical as the condition can be fatal; however, yet anticoagulation carries hemorrhage risk and high costs and should not be administered indiscriminately.

The most common sequela of DVT is post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), occurring in approximately 40% of patients presenting with a DVT.6 Patients with this condition develop pain, heaviness, swelling, and occasionally ulceration of the affected limb. Post-thrombotic syndrome is characterized by fibrotic injury due to thrombosis-induced inflammation; this results in a thickened and noncompliant vein wall with valvular reflux and often mechanical obstruction that in turn leads to venous hypertension.7,8 The concept of mechanical obstruction has been coined the “open vein hypothesis,” and although major efforts have been made to alleviate the obstruction through invasive means, there have been only modest gains.9,10

In 2008, the Acting Surgeon General issued a call to action to prevent VTE by promoting research and new clinical therapies.11 Despite this attention, several challenges still remain, particularly with regard to venous thrombus (VT) resolution and PTS. Major diagnostic and therapeutic gaps include identification of a simple, rapid, low-cost blood test with high sensitivity and specificity to identify patients with acute DVT and those at risk of developing PTS; development of agents that promote DVT resolution without bleeding risks associated with anticoagulation; and an oral or intravenous medication that prevents PTS. While the therapeutic gold standard is based on human drug and device trials, most first efforts rely on murine models.

The purpose of this review is three-fold: (1) to briefly discuss commonly used mouse models of DVT; (2) to review several novel biomarkers that may have a role in the pathophysiology of DVT and PTS; and (3) to review potential pharmacologic targets for the treatment of PTS.



Although they have the same limitations associated with any animal models of disease, murine models provide a relatively consistent way to investigate DVT and PTS. They provide tissue to investigate basic biologic changes associated with VT as well as post-VT vein wall and thrombus changes. Large vein thrombosis does not occur spontaneously in rodents; therefore, several differing models have been developed with variations in blood stasis and endothelial injury to stimulate thrombosis (Table 1).

Table 1. Prevalence of chronic venous insufficiency excluding varicose veins. Data modified from Rabe et al.7,9-14


Inferior Vena Cava Ligation Model

This model uses ligation of the infrarenal inferior vena cava (IVC) to cause total blood stasis.12 Studies in rats suggest that after IVC ligation, a combination of stasis-induced vein wall injury with enhanced tissue factor expression in endothelial cells and leukocytes produce thrombosis.13 This widely used model has provided reproducible thrombus weights beginning at 3 hours and extending to 42 days.12 It has also been valuable in studying interactions between the vein wall and thrombus during the progression from acute to chronic inflammation and remodeling of the vein wall. Disadvantages include the lack of blood flow to test new agents and the inability of the IVC to reopen because of the ligature.

IVC Stenosis Model

This model was initially developed to study early acute thrombosis in a thrombus with morphology similar to the ligation model, although this one permits perithrombus blood flow. The IVC stenosis model narrows the IVC approximately 95% just below the renal veins.14 A disadvantage of this model is the large variation in the size and incidence of VT. Some animals show no evidence of thrombus, whereas in others the vein is completely occluded.

Electrolytic IVC Injury Model

An alternative to the stenosis model, the electrolytic model was first described by Cooley et al. after they used electrolysis to generate VT in a murine femoral vein.15,16 However, the small size of this vessel and thrombus limits the sample size for molecular analysis. A small area of endothelial denudation observed at the needle entry point contributes to thrombus formation, and a laminar thrombus is formed while maintaining a flow channel. Thrombus weights remain consistent with acceptable standard deviations to detect differences in experimental groups, from 6 hours to 14 days post injury.12,17

 Brief Pathophysiology of Experimental VT

Although the clotting cascade and its factors are well studied and accepted, several other factors play a role in DVT as determined by the aforementioned VT models. Formation and early resolution of VT is characterized by the influx of neutrophils (PMNs), which promote coagulation by inhibiting anticoagulant factors and releasing neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) in a process called NETosis.18,19 NETs act as a scaffold for thrombi to adhere to activated platelets and endothelial cells.20 They also allow for the deposition of proteins such as fibrinogen and von Willebrand factor, which further promote thrombogenesis.20

As is characteristic of a sterile inflammatory process, late VT resolution is mediated by monocytes/macrophages that facilitate collagen and matrix remodeling, in part through matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs).21 Several other mechanisms are involved with VT resolution and vein wall injury, including inflammatory chemokines, cytokines, and plasminogen activators and inhibitors.22 Other factors include upregulation of vein wall adhesion molecules such as P- and E-selectin (sel) and also intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), which mediates the interaction of the vein wall with circulating leukocytes and platelets.23

The P- and E-selectins are involved in the venous thrombogenic process (Figure 1). P-sel is the primary adhesion molecule mediating the initial inflammatory response and plays a key role in chronic inflammation as well. It is present in the platelet alpha granules and endothelial cell Weibel-Palade bodies and is translocated to the plasma membrane.24 The main receptor for P-sel is PSGL-Ig. E-sel is a glycoprotein expressed on activated endothelium that facilitates thrombosis, directly modulating PMN and monocyte activity. Furthermore, E-sel has also been identified as an important regulator of thrombus formation and fibrin content in a mouse VT model.25,26 To further evaluate the role of selectins in the thromboinflammatory response, Myers et al. studied a murine model in which either P-sel, E-sel, or both had been genetically deleted. They found that deletion of E-sel and combined P/E-sel was associated with decreased thrombosis, whereas the inflammatory response in the vein wall was most inhibited in the combined P/E-sel and P-sel groups.25

Several potential biomarkers have been identified within this context, including intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), P-sel, and NETs (Table 2).

Figure 1. Illustration of the interaction between the vessel wall, ICAM-1, P-selectin, neutrophils, NETs, red blood cells, platelets, and thrombus formation. (A) Normal blood flow before thrombotic event; no NET formation or upregulation of ICAM-1 and P-selectin. (B) Thrombus formation with NETs providing scaffolding; upregulation of ICAM-1 and P-selectin present as well as increased presence of neutrophils in response to thrombus. ICAM-1: intracellular adhesion molecule-1; NETs: neutrophil extracellular traps; RBCs: red blood cells
Table 2. Somatic and psychic scores by CEAP classification in the Bonn Vein Study (BVS). Modified from Amsler, Rabe, and Blättler.44 CEAP: clinical-etiology-anatomy-pathophysiology classification for venous disorders; BVS: Bonn Vein Study; SC: somatic component of Psychic versus Somatic Venous Disease Questionnaire (PsySoVDQ); PC: psychic component of PsySoVDQ.


Currently Used Biomarkers

Although useful to rule out the diagnosis of VTE, the use of D-dimer as a biomarker is not as useful to “rule in” the diagnosis since its sensitivity is as high as 98% while its specificity hovers around 60%.27 The use of d-Dimer is well accepted for increasing the pre-test probability if positive, thus it is sensitive but not specific. Another currently used biomarker is factor VIII, the elevation of which may be useful for predicting recurrent DVT.28


ICAM-1 mediates attachment of leukocytes to endothelial cells, allowing the leukocytes to migrate into the tissue during an immune response (Figure 1).29 Serum levels of ICAM-1 may reflect local endothelial and leukocyte activation.30 Experimentally, ICAM-1 has been shown to be mechanistically involved in small vessel thrombosis and large vessel VT in the setting of sepsis in mice.31,32 Several studies evaluating ICAM-1 in the setting of acute DVT found that it lacked the sensitivity or specificity to warrant further investigation.33-35 However, soluble ICAM-1 (sICAM-1) may reflect the severity of PTS.36 In the BioSOX trial that evaluated several inflammatory markers in over 600 patients post thrombosis, elevated sICAM-1 was associated with a risk of developing PTS.36 This was consistent with a previously published study confirming the association of sICAM-1 with development of PTS in 307 patients.37 In both studies, PTS was defined as a Villalta score of ? 5 (moderate severity). Further validation is required to determine if sICAM-1 is a sensitive and specific biomarker for predicting incident moderate to severe PTS.


In humans, elevated levels of soluble P-sel (sP-sel) are common in DVT and VTE.35 Using sP-sel as a biomarker may increase the positive predictive value in patients with a possible DVT, to supplement imaging, or when diagnostic imaging methods are not available (such as at night in many emergency rooms). A study evaluating the use of sP-sel combined with a Wells risk prediction score for diagnosing VTE showed a sensitivity of 91% (low sP-sel and low Wells score to rule out the diagnosis) and a specificity of 98% (high sP-sel and high Wells score to rule in the diagnosis), suggesting this combination may be able to rule in the diagnosis of DVT.27  Thus, the highest sensitivity and specificity may be a combination of sP-sel, a high-sensitivity D-dimer, and the Wells score.38

NETs and Their Metabolites

NETs can be detected in humans by elevated levels of “cell-free” DNA in circulation,39 suggesting potential use of this NET byproduct as a biomarker for diagnosing VTE. However, no studies to date have evaluated NETs or NET byproducts as a biomarker for diagnosing acute DVT.


While major advances have been made using direct oral anticoagulants, the risk of bleeding remains. The most promising new avenues for preventing pathologic clotting are inhibition of factor XI, P/E-sel, and NETs.

Factor XI

Factor XI has procoagulant effects but is not required for hemostasis.40 While it lacks functionality as a biomarker for DVT, factor XI has definite therapeutic potential. It promotes thrombosis through the contact pathway, which occurs when blood comes in contact with an artificial or negatively charged substance, as part of the intrinsic pathway. In a clinical trial of orthopedic surgery prophylaxis, inhibition of factor XI reduced the risk of developing VTE complications post surgery when compared to enoxaparin but did not cause a significant increase in the risk of bleeding.40 Epidemiological studies in a population deficient for factor XI consistently found a significantly lower incidence of DVT when compared to the control population.41 These studies suggest that inhibition of factor XI decreases VTE as effectively as current anticoagulants but without bleeding risk. Strategies to target factor XI include antisense oligonucleotides, aptamers, antibodies, small molecules, and polyanion antagonists.42

Selectin Inhibition

Although not yet tested in large human trials, P-sel inhibition effectively treats established VT in a primate model of iliofemoral VT formation. Two days after thrombus development, baboons were treated with recombinant P-sel glycoprotein ligand-Ig (rPSGL-Ig, 4 mg/kg), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), or saline, and treatment continued once weekly (rPSGL-Ig) or daily (LMWH, saline) based on drug half-life assessment.43 The percent spontaneous vein reopening increased significantly in the proximal iliac vein in animals treated with rPSGL-Ig and LMWH compared with controls. We have also seen the same treatment effect with an aptamer against P-sel that blocks the P-sel:PSGL-1 interaction,44 with improved vein recanalization compared to an aptamer against von Willebrand factor and LMWH, when measured 21 days after thrombogenesis.

Patients homozygous for the S128R E-sel allele, which codes for a more active E-sel, have an increased risk for recurrence of VT.45 Endotoxin-induced, tissue factor-mediated coagulation is enhanced in humans carrying the S128R E-sel allele,46 highlighting the importance of E-sel in VT. We have recently demonstrated that an inhibitor of E-sel treats both murine and patient DVT,47 with essentially no or very limited bleeding potential; this suggests that E-sel may be an excellent target for ongoing VTE trials.


Directly reducing NET formation may offer a safer alternative to anticoagulation treatment by decreasing a prothrombotic factor without compromising hemostasis (Figure 1). Exogenous DNAse has been successful in decreasing VT in animal studies as well as inhibiting the primary NET enzyme called peptidyl arginine deiminase 4.48 While more research is needed, some therapies used to treat VTE, including treatments such as polyanionic heparin and clopidogrel, also affect NETs.49


The primary sequela of DVT is PTS, leading to pain and discomfort in the affected extremity due to venous hypertension. Experimental data has suggested several potential therapeutic avenues that warrant further investigation given the disappointing fact that no medical or surgical therapies currently exist.

 Toll-Like Receptor 9

Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) is an important host innate immune response receptor that may drive leukocyte promotion of thrombus resolution.50 A study using mice with genetically deleted TLR9 showed a larger thrombus size, suggesting the importance of TLR9 in facilitating thrombus resolution.50 This role of TLR9 points to its potential diagnostic capability in a clinical setting, with a small pilot study showing that patients with lower levels of TLR9 are predisposed to persistent vein wall thickening after a DVT.51 An appealing aspect of this target is the use of an ODN TLR9 agonist (an aptamer) to decrease early VT experimentally in mice,52 which may translate to humans.

Matrix Metalloproteinases-2 and -9

Matrix metalloproteinases-2 and -9 (MMP-2 and -9) are common proteinases that help degrade and remodel the extracellular matrix (ECM) of vessels,21 including degradation of elastin and collagen, and contribute to cellular movement through the ECM.53 These proteinases are found in the vein wall during thrombus resolution, likely originating from monocytes and the vein wall, with MMP-9 activity peaking early post-thrombosis and MMP-2 active during late thrombus resolution.54,55 MMP-9 has been evaluated in one human trial but was not elevated post DVT.35  Data from mice genetically deficient in MMP-2 and MMP-9 showed decreased vein wall injury and preservation of vessel function post-thrombus.56 Although systemic inhibition would likely not be as appealing, targeting an inhibitor localized to the thrombosed vein may hold promise.

Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) is a protein found in humans that serves to inhibit protease tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA).57 Genetic deletion of PAI-1 in mice results in dramatically improved VT resolution but at the expense of a fibrotic vein wall.58 Mice that overexpress PAI-1 have large residual thrombi but a relatively preserved vein wall.59 The beneficial effects of PAI-1 overexpression are probably related to the vitronectin-binding domain of PAI-1 that limits the attachment of profibrotic monocytes/macrophages to the vein wall. A unique approach to rapidly resolving thrombi while preventing vein wall injury would be to inhibit the protease function of PAI-1 while allowing the vitronectin-binding domain to function, which at this point is only experimental.

Interleukin-6 Inhibition

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a prototypical inflammatory cytokine that is elevated in many disease conditions. It may contribute to thrombus formation by indirectly activating the extrinsic pathway of coagulation,60 although its role is likely multifactorial. Elevated levels of IL-6 or genetic polymorphism may reflect endothelial dysfunction61 and may correlate with the severity of DVT.36 Experimental data has shown smaller VT and decreased vein wall fibrosis in mice undergoing neutralization of IL-6, suggesting IL-6 as a potential mechanism in the development of PTS.62 The IL-6 signaling axis is a clinical target in rheumatoid arthritis, and the drug tocilizumab is efficacious in reducing inflammation and symptoms.63


Much research on DVT is needed with a specific focus on biomarkers for more precision therapy, non-anticoagulant therapy, and PTS. Murine models, with all their inherent limitations, provide the best avenue for developing new knowledge relating to these areas. The prospects closest to human translation are the use of sPsel as a biomarker for incident VTE, factor XI and E-sel inhibition for therapy, and anti-IL-6 pathway for PTS prevention.

Key Points

  • VTE is common and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.
  • The primary therapy for VTE is medical, and better diagnostic and predictive markers are needed, with several potentially on the horizon for human translation.
  • Post-thrombotic syndrome has no good preventative therapy, and recent aggressive endoluminal and compression interventions have not shown significant benefit.
  • More study is needed of PTS, but antifibrotic approaches may be most applicable.
Conflict of Interest Disclosure

The authors have completed and submitted the Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal Conflict of Interest Statement and none were reported.

  1. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(10):e146-603.
  2. Silverstein MD, Heit JA, Mohr DN, Petterson TM, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ 3rd. Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 1998 Mar 23;158(6):585-93.
  3. Königsbrügge O, Pabinger I, Ay C. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in cancer: novel findings from the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study (CATS). Thromb Res. 2014 May;133 Suppl 2:S39-43.
  4. Pannucci CJ, Shanks A, Moote MJ, et al. Identifying patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism requiring treatment after outpatient surgery. Ann Surg. 2012 Jun;255(6):1093-9.
  5. Obi AT, Pannucci CJ, Nackashi A, et al. Validation of the Caprini Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment Model in Critically Ill Surgical Patients. JAMA Surg. 2015 Oct;150(10):941-8.
  6. Kahn SR. The post-thrombotic syndrome: the forgotten morbidity of deep venous thrombosis. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2006 Feb;21(1):41-8.
  7. ten Cate-Hoek AJ, Henke PK, Wakefield TW. The post thrombotic syndrome: Ignore it and it will come back to bite you. Blood Rev. 2016 Mar;30(2):131-7.
  8. Bergan JJ, Schmid-Schönbein GW, Smith PD, Nicolaides AN, Boisseau MR, Eklof B. Chronic venous disease. N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 3;355(5):488-98.
  9. Popuri RK, Vedantham S. The role of thrombolysis in the clinical management of deep vein thrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011 Mar;31(3):479-84.
  10. Vedantham S, Goldhaber SZ, Julian JA, et al.; ATTRACT Trial Investigators. Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Deep-Vein Thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 7;377(23):2240-2252.
  11. Wakefield TW, McLafferty RB, Lohr JM, Caprini JA, Gillespie DL, Passman MA; Executive Committee of the American Venous Forum. Call to action to prevent venous thromboembolism. J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jun;49(6):1620-3.
  12. Diaz JA, Obi AT, Myers DD Jr, et al. Critical review of mouse models of venous thrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012 Mar;32(3):556-62.
  13. Zhou J, May L, Liao P, Gross PL, Weitz JI. Inferior vena cava ligation rapidly induces tissue factor expression and venous thrombosis in rats. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009 Jun;29(6):863-9.
  14. Humphries J, Gossage JA, Modarai B, et al. Monocyte urokinase-type plasminogen activator up-regulation reduces thrombus size in a model of venous thrombosis. J Vasc Surg. 2009 Nov;50(5):1127-34.
  15. Diaz JA, Hawley AE, Alvarado CM, et al. Thrombogenesis with continuous blood flow in the inferior vena cava. A novel mouse model. Thromb Haemost. 2010;104(2):366-375.
  16. Cooley BC. In vivo fluorescence imaging of large-vessel thrombosis in mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011 Jun;31(6):1351-6.
  17. Diaz JA, Wrobleski SK, Hawley AE, Lucchesi BR, Wakefield TW, Myers DD Jr. Electrolytic inferior vena cava model (EIM) of venous thrombosis. J Vis Exp. 2011 Jul 12;(53):e2737.
  18. Meng H, Yalavarthi S, Kanthi Y, et al. In Vivo Role of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Antiphospholipid Antibody-Mediated Venous Thrombosis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Mar;69(3):655-67.
  19. von Brühl ML, Stark K, Steinhart A, et al. Monocytes, neutrophils, and platelets cooperate to initiate and propagate venous thrombosis in mice in vivo. J Exp Med. 2012 Apr 9;209(4):819-35.
  20. Rao AN, Kazzaz NM, Knight JS. Do neutrophil extracellular traps contribute to the heightened risk of thrombosis in inflammatory diseases? World J Cardiol. 2015 Dec 26;7(12):829-42.
  21. Deroo S, Deatrick KB, Henke PK. The vessel wall: A forgotten player in post thrombotic syndrome. Thromb Haemost. 2010 Oct;104(4):681-92.
  22. Henke PK, Wakefield T. Thrombus resolution and vein wall injury: dependence on chemokines and leukocytes. Thromb Res. 2009;123 Suppl 4:S72-78.
  23. Wakefield TW, Myers DD, Henke PK. Mechanisms of venous thrombosis and resolution. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008 Mar;28(3):387-91.
  24. Takada M, Nadeau KC, Shaw GD, Marquette KA, Tilney NL. The cytokine-adhesion molecule cascade in ischemia/reperfusion injury of the rat kidney. Inhibition by a soluble P-selectin ligand. J Clin Invest. 1997 Jun 1;99(11):2682-90.
  25. Myers D Jr, Farris D, Hawley A, et al. Selectins influence thrombosis in a mouse model of experimental deep venous thrombosis. J Surg Res. 2002 Dec;108(2):212-21.
  26. Sullivan VV, Hawley AE, Farris DM, et al. Decrease in fibrin content of venous thrombi in selectin-deficient mice. J Surg Res. 2003 Jan;109(1):1-7.
  27. Vandy FC, Stabler C, Eliassen AM, et al. Soluble P-selectin for the diagnosis of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2013 Apr 1;1(2):117-25.
  28. Timp JF, Lijfering WM, Flinterman LE, et al. Predictive value of factor VIII levels for recurrent venous thrombosis: results from the MEGA follow-up study. J Thromb Haemost. 2015 Oct;13(10):1823-32.
  29. Frank PG, Lisanti MP. ICAM-1: role in inflammation and in the regulation of vascular permeability. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008 Sep;295(3):H926-H927.
  30. Isogai N, Tanaka H, Asamura S. Thrombosis and altered expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) after avulsion injury in rat vessels. J Hand Surg Br. 2004 Jun;29(3):230-4.
  31. Darbousset R, Thomas GM, Mezouar S, et al. Tissue factor-positive neutrophils bind to injured endothelial wall and initiate thrombus formation. Blood. 2012 Sep 6;120(10):2133-43.
  32. Obi AT, Andraska E, Kanthi Y, et al. Endotoxaemia-augmented murine venous thrombosis is dependent on TLR-4 and ICAM-1, and potentiated by neutropenia. Thromb Haemost. 2017 Jan 26;117(2):339-48.
  33. Smith A, Quarmby JW, Collins M, Lockhart SM, Burnand KG. Changes in the levels of soluble adhesion molecules and coagulation factors in patients with deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 1999 Dec;82(6):1593-9.
  34. Bucek RA, Reiter M, Quehenberger P, Minar E, Baghestanian M. The role of soluble cell adhesion molecules in patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2003 Oct;14(7):653-7.
  35. Mosevoll KA, Lindas R, Tvedt TH, Bruserud Ø, Reikvam H. Altered plasma levels of cytokines, soluble adhesion molecules and matrix metalloproteases in venous thrombosis. Thromb Res. 2015 Jul;136(1):30-9.
  36. Rabinovich A, Cohen JM, Cushman M, et al. Inflammation markers and their trajectories after deep vein thrombosis in relation to risk of post-thrombotic syndrome. J Thromb Haemost. 2015 Mar;13(3):398-408.
  37. Shbaklo H, Holcroft CA, Kahn SR. Levels of inflammatory markers and the development of the post-thrombotic syndrome. Thromb Haemost. 2009 Mar;101(3):505-12.
  38. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2003 Sep 25;349(13):1227-35.
  39. Diaz JA, Fuchs TA, Jackson TO, et al. Plasma DNA is Elevated in Patients with Deep Vein Thrombosis. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2013 Oct 1;1(4):341-348.e1..
  40. Weitz JI, Fredenburgh JC. Factors XI and XII as Targets for New Anticoagulants. Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 Feb 24;4:19.
  41. Salomon O, Steinberg DM, Zucker M, Varon D, Zivelin A, Seligsohn U. Patients with severe factor XI deficiency have a reduced incidence of deep-vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 2011 Feb;105(2):269-73.
  42. Weitz JI, Fredenburgh JC. 2017 Scientific Sessions Sol Sherry Distinguished Lecture in Thrombosis: Factor XI as a Target for New Anticoagulants. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2018 Feb;38(2):304-10.
  43. Myers D, Wrobleski S, Londy F, et al. New and effective treatment of experimentally induced venous thrombosis with anti-inflammatory rPSGL-Ig. Thromb Haemost. 2002 Mar;87(3):374-82.
  44. Diaz JA, Wrobleski SK, Alvarado CM, et al. P-selectin inhibition therapeutically promotes thrombus resolution and prevents vein wall fibrosis better than enoxaparin and an inhibitor to von Willebrand factor. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015 Apr;35(4):829-37.
  45. Jilma B, Kovar FM, Hron G, et al. Homozygosity in the single nucleotide polymorphism Ser128Arg in the E-selectin gene associated with recurrent venous thromboembolism. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Aug 14-28;166(15):1655-9.
  46. Jilma B, Marsik C, Kovar F, Wagner OF, Jilma-Stohlawetz P, Endler G. The single nucleotide polymorphism Ser128Arg in the E-selectin gene is associated with enhanced coagulation during human endotoxemia. Blood. 2005 Mar 15;105(6):2380-3.
  47. Culmer DL, Dunbar ML, Hawley AE, et al. E-selectin inhibition with GMI-1271 decreases venous thrombosis without profoundly affecting tail vein bleeding in a mouse model. Thromb Haemost. 2017 Jun 2;117(6):1171-81.
  48. Fuchs TA, Brill A, Wagner DD. Neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) impact on deep vein thrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012 Aug;32(8):1777-83.
  49. Kimball AS, Obi AT, Diaz JA, Henke PK. The Emerging Role of NETs in Venous Thrombosis and Immunothrombosis. Front Immunol. 2016 Jun 27;7:236.
  50. Dewyer NA, El-Sayed OM, Luke CE, et al. Divergent effects of Tlr9 deletion in experimental late venous thrombosis resolution and vein wall injury. Thromb Haemost. 2015 Nov;114(5):1028-37.
  51. Deatrick KB, Elfline M, Baker N, et al. Postthrombotic vein wall remodeling: preliminary observations. J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jan;53(1):139-46.
  52. Henke PK, Mitsuya M, Luke CE, et al. Toll-like receptor 9 signaling is critical for early experimental deep vein thrombosis resolution. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011 Jan;31(1):43-9.
  53. Deatrick KB, Eliason JL, Lynch EM, et al. Vein wall remodeling after deep vein thrombosis involves matrix metalloproteinases and late fibrosis in a mouse model. J Vasc Surg. 2005 Jul;42(1):140-8.
  54. Sood V, Luke CE, Deatrick KB, et al. Urokinase plasminogen activator independent early experimental thrombus resolution: MMP2 as an alternative mechanism. Thromb Haemost. 2010 Dec;104(6):1174-83.
  55. Deatrick KB, Obi A, Luke CE, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 deletion is associated with decreased mid-term vein wall fibrosis in experimental stasis DVT. Thromb Res. 2013 Sep;132(3):360-6.
  56. Deatrick KB, Luke CE, Elfline MA, et al. The effect of matrix metalloproteinase 2 and matrix metalloproteinase 2/9 deletion in experimental post-thrombotic vein wall remodeling. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Nov;58(5):1375-1384.e2.
  57. Obi AT, Diaz JA, Farris DM, et al. Vitronectin Gene-deletion, PAI-1 Gene-deletion, and LMWH Treatment: Effect on Thrombus Resolution and Vein Wall Remodeling in a Mouse Model of DVT. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2013 Jan;1(1):103.
  58. Baldwin JF, Sood V, Elfline MA, et al. The role of urokinase plasminogen activator and plasmin activator inhibitor-1 on vein wall remodeling in experimental deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Surg. 2012 Oct;56(4):1089-97.
  59. Obi AT, Diaz JA, Ballard-Lipka NL, et al. Plasminogen activator-1 overexpression decreases experimental postthrombotic vein wall fibrosis by a non-vitronectin-dependent mechanism. J Thromb Haemost. 2014 Aug;12(8):1353-63.
  60. Hou H, Ge Z, Ying P, et al. Biomarkers of deep venous thrombosis. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2012 Oct;34(3):335-46.
  61. Matos MF, Lourenco DM, Orikaza CM, Bajerl JA, Noguti MA, Morelli VM. The role of IL-6, IL-8 and MCP-1 and their promoter polymorphisms IL-6 -174GC, IL-8 -251AT and MCP-1 -2518AG in the risk of venous thromboembolism: a case-control study. Thromb Res. 2011 Sep;128(3):216-20.
  62. Wojcik BM, Wrobleski SK, Hawley AE, Wakefield TW, Myers DD Jr, Diaz JA. Interleukin-6: a potential target for post-thrombotic syndrome. Ann Vasc Surg. 2011 Feb;25(2):229-39.
  63. McInnes IB, Thompson L, Giles JT, et al. Effect of interleukin-6 receptor blockade on surrogates of vascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis: MEASURE, a randomised, placebo-controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(4):694-702.

Add Comments

Please login to dialogue with author.